Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 6;11(97):20140349. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0349

Table 1.

Comparison of coverage thresholds across vaccination strategies and pathogen contagiousness. For each vaccination strategy, the coverage threshold is provided as a percentage of the community, with the number of individuals vaccinated in parentheses, for (A) the mean outbreak size to affect less than 10% of the community (minimum coverage threshold) and (B) an outbreak to affect less than 10% of the community in at least 95% of the simulations (conservative coverage threshold). The table shows results for trait-based simulations using a single adult male category (M). Results were identical for simulations using this category M or three adult male categories (HM, MM, LM; see Results), except for a few instances, denoted by superscripts (*) and (**) in which simulations using HM, MM and LM categories required vaccinating one less or one more individual, respectively.

control strategy Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
(A) minimum coverage threshold
centrality-based 0% (0) 24.3% (9) 40.5% (15) 56.8% (21)
trait-based 0% (0) 29.7% (11) 43.2% (16)* 59.5% (22)
random 0% (0) 35.1% (13) 51.4% (19) 64.9% (24)
(B) conservative coverage threshold
centrality-based 29.7% (11) 51.4% (19) 59.5% (22) 81.1% (30)
trait-based 37.8% (14)* 54.1% (20)* 64.9% (24) 81.1% (30)**
random 46.0% (17) 64.9% (24) 75.7% (28) 86.5% (32)