Table 3. Adjusted correlation between well-being and health indicators, Finland, Poland and Spain, 2011–2012.
| Variable | Positive affecta |
Negative affectb |
Evaluative well-beingc |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient (95% CI) | Effect size, β coefficient | Coefficient (95% CI) | Effect size, β coefficient | Coefficient (95% CI) | Effect size, β coefficient | |||
| Aged | 0.13 (0.11 to 0.16) | 0.16*** | −0.07 (−0.09 to −0.05) | −0.13*** | 0.02 (−0.02 to 0.05) | 0.02 | ||
| Sex (Ref. = female) | −0.03 (−0.10 to 0.05) | −0.01 | 0.02 (−0.03 to 0.06) | 0.01 | −0.12 (−0.21 to −0.04) | −0.03** | ||
| Married or in partnership (Ref. = no) | −0.04 (−0.13 to 0.03) | −0.02 | −0.01 (−0.05 to 0.04) | −0.00 | 0.27 (0.18 to 0.36) | 0.07*** | ||
| Years of education | −0.03 (−0.04 to −0.02) | −0.09*** | 0.02 (0.01 to 0.03) | 0.09*** | 0.01 (0.00 to 0.02) | 0.03* | ||
| Residential setting (Ref. = rural) | 0.03 (−0.06 to 0.12) | 0.01 | 0.03 (−0.03 to 0.09) | 0.01 | −0.06 (−0.16 to 0.04) | −0.01 | ||
| Occupational status | −0.01 (−0.03 to 0.01) | −0.02 | −0.00 (−0.01 to 0.01) | −0.00 | −0.05 (−0.07 to −0.03) | −0.07*** | ||
| Income (Ref. = 1st/2nd quintile) | 0.05 (−0.02 to 0.13) | 0.02 | −0.02 (−0.07 to 0.03) | −0.01 | 0.28 (0.19 to 0.37) | 0.08*** | ||
| Depressive episode (Ref. = no) | −0.31 (−0.44 to −0.18) | −0.07*** | 0.37 (0.26 to 0.48) | 0.14*** | −0.69 (−0.87 to −0.52) | −0.13*** | ||
| Health statusd | 0.23 (0.19 to 0.27) | 0.20*** | −0.17 (−0.19 to −0.15) | −0.23*** | 0.44 (0.39 to 0.48) | 0.29*** | ||
| Cognitive functioningd | 0.05 (0.01 to 0.09) | 0.06** | −0.04 (−0.06 to −0.02) | −0.07*** | 0.09 (0.05 to 0.13) | 0.08*** | ||
CI: confidence interval; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
a Goodness-of-fit, adjusted R2 = 0.085.
b Goodness-of-fit, adjusted R2 = 0.111.
c Goodness-of-fit, adjusted R2 = 0.340.
d Regression coefficient is reported in 10-point increments.
Note: Weighted data. Analyses were controlled for country.