Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 13;92(10):716–725. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.129254

Table 4. Effect estimates of health status on well-being using structural equation models, Finland, Poland and Spain, 2011–2012.

Variable All countries
Finland
Poland
Spain
Effect, B coefficient (SE) Effect size, β coefficient R2 Effect, B coefficient (SE) Effect size, β coefficient R2 Effect, B coefficient (SE) Effect size, β coefficient R2 Effect, B coefficient (SE) Effect size, β coefficient R2
Well-being
Evaluative well-being 1.00 (0.00) 0.43*** 0.19 1.00 (0.00) 0.13** 0.02 1.00 (0.00) 0.33*** 0.11 1.00 (0.00) 0.38*** 0.15
Positive affect 1.11 (0.21) 0.63*** 0.40 4.50 (1.52) 0.72*** 0.51 1.74 (0.27) 0.61*** 0.38 1.29 (0.11) 0.75*** 0.57
Negative affecta 0.72 (0.14) 0.63*** 0.40 2.31 (1.87) 0.73*** 0.53 1.16 (0.22) 0.72*** 0.51 1.06 (0.10) 0.73*** 0.53
Health status 0.03 (0.01) 0.42*** NA 0.01 (0.00) 0.33*** NA 0.02 (0.00) 0.40*** NA 0.02 (0.00) 0.28*** NA
Covariateb
Age 0.01 (0.00) 0.23*** NA 0.01 (0.00) 0.38*** NA 0.01 (0.00) 0.15*** NA 0.01 (0.00) 0.20*** NA
Sex −0.03 (0.03) −0.02 NA −0.00 (0.01) −0.01 NA −0.04 (0.04) −0.04 NA 0.03 (0.03) 0.02 NA
Married or in partnership 0.02 (0.03) 0.01 NA 0.00 (0.01) 0.01 NA 0.05 (0.04) 0.05 NA −0.04 (0.03) −0.03 NA
Years of education −0.02 (0.00) −0.13*** NA −0.00 (0.00) −0.09* NA −0.02 (0.01) −0.10* NA −0.01 (0.00) −0.12*** NA
Residential setting 0.00 (0.03) 0.00 NA 0.02 (0.02) 0.05 NA 0.04 (0.03) 0.03 NA −0.14 (0.05) −0.08** NA
Occupation −0.01 (0.01) −0.04* NA −0.00 (0.00) −0.03 NA −0.01 (0.01) −0.06 NA 0.00 (0.01) 0.01 NA
Income 0.07 (0.04) 0.05* NA −0.01 (0.02) −0.01 NA 0.03 (0.04) 0.03 NA 0.07 (0.03) 0.05* NA
Depression −0.41 (0.08) −0.17*** NA −0.00 (0.03) −0.01 NA −0.40 (0.09) −0.20*** NA −0.34 (0.08) −0.20*** NA
Cognitive functioning 0.01 (0.00) 0.16*** NA −0.00 (0.00) −0.04 NA 0.01 (0.00) 0.08* NA 0.01 (0.00) 0.14*** NA

NA: not applicable; R2: relationship between evaluative well-being, positive affect and negative affect of the well-being construct and the whole well-being construct; SE: standard error. ; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

a The sign for negative affect was changed so that variables in a same construct had the same direction.

b The reference category for categorical variables was the same as in the regression analysis.

Note: Weighted data. Controlled for covariates.