Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 24;9(10):e111037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111037

Table 4. Performance of hrHPV testing for the detection of CIN2/3 six months after cryotherapy.

Post- treatment TP FP FN TN Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
hrHPV 17 39 1 22 0.94 (0.73–1.00) 0.36 (0.24–0.49) 0.30 (.19–0.44) 0.96 (0.78–1.00)
HPV16 7 6 11 55 0.39 (0.17–0.64) 0.90 (0.80–0.96) 0.54 (0.25–0.81) 0.83 (0.72–0.91)
HPV18 4 8 14 53 0.22 (0.06–0.48) 0.87 (0.76–0.94) 0.33 (0.10–0.65) 0.79 (0.67–0.88)
HPV16/18 11 14 7 47 0.61 (0.36–0.83) 0.77 (0.65–0.87) 0.44 (0.24–0.65) 0.87 (0.75–0.95)
Persistent hrHPV1 17 32 1 29 0.94 (0.73–1.00) 0.48 (0.35–0.61) 0.35 (0.22–0.50) 0.97 (0.83–1.00)

Kenya, 79 HIV-positive women.

1

At least 1 same hrHPV type present before and 6 months after cryotherapy.

TP, true positive, FP, false positive, FN, false negative, TN, true negative, PPV, positive predictive value, NPV, negative predictive value, hrHPV, high-risk human papillomavirus.