Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 11;12:99. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-99

Table 2.

Effects of holding in EH medium on energy/redox parameters of equine oocytes examined before or after IVM

Treatment Nuclear chromatin configuration n. of analyzed oocytes Mitochondrial activity Intracellular ROS levels Mitochondria/ROS colocalization
EH FN 4 387.42 ± 347.10a 661.20 ± 404.12 0.40 ± 0.13a
IMM 9 1248.63 ± 657.93b,* 1330.73 ± 651.51 0.64 ± 0.18b
EH F/I 2 § § §
IMM 13 273.23 ± 142.95 709.72 ± 423.16 0.56 ± 0.23
EH CC 20 545.15 ± 283.98 829.89 ± 336.91 0.63 ± 0.16
IMM 12 509.19 ± 242.27** 882.61 ± 486.82 0.67 ± 0.14
EH PI/MI 11 653.80 ± 191.53 946.64 ± 561.87 0.71 ± 0.11
IMM 0 § § §
EH -IVM POST-IVM MII 32 1112.45 ± 494.10 1434.54 ± 686.00 0.76 ± 0.14
IMM-IVM 43 1372.64 ± 481.34 1982.04 ± 762.74 0.84 ± 0.13

Legend: Homogenous/heterogeneously fluorescent nucleus (FN); Fibrillar/Intermediate (F/I); Condensed chromatin (CC); Prometaphase I/Metaphase I (PI/MI); Metaphase II (MII). Mitochondrial activity and intracellular ROS levels are presented as MitoTracker and DCF fluorescence intensities expressed in Arbitrary Densitometric Units (ADU). Mitochondria/ROS colocalization is expressed as Pearson’s correlation coefficient. One-way ANOVA followed by Multiple Comparison Dunn’s method: a,b P <0.05; *, **P =0.004; § values for categories with fewer than 3 oocytes are not shown.