Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 11;12:99. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-99

Table 4.

Effects of holding in EH medium at controlled room temperature (25°C) on confocal energy/redox parameters of equine oocytes

Treatment Nuclear chromatin configuration n. of analyzed oocytes Mitochondrial activity Intracellular ROS levels Mitochondria/ROS colocalization
EH FN 3 162.89 ± 101.19 172.93 ± 46.40 §
IMM 2 § § §
EH F/I 4 437.35 ± 298.64 377.13 ± 181.20 0.40 ± 0.32
IMM 9 623.01 ± 376.96a 421.44 ± 164.87 0.38 ± 0.08
EH CC 20 547.82 ± 499.54 278.53 ± 179.28 0.50 ± 0.10
IMM 19 722.93 ± 390.31a 377.92 ± 184.92 0.49 ± 0.19
EH PI/MI 0 § § §
IMM 3 1292 ± 192.36b 643.67 ± 312.69 0.60 ± 0.10
EH MII 0 § § §
IMM 2 § § §

Legend: Homogenous/heterogeneously fluorescent nucleus (FN); Fibrillar/Intermediate (F/I); Condensed chromatin (CC); Prometaphase I/Metaphase I (PI/MI); Metaphase II (MII). Mitochondrial activity and intracellular ROS levels are presented as MitoTracker and DCF fluorescence intensities expressed in Arbitrary Densitometric Units (ADU). Mitochondria/ROS colocalization is expressed as Pearson’s correlation coefficient. One-way ANOVA followed by Multiple Comparison Holm-Sidak method: a,b P <0.05; §: values for categories with fewer than 3 oocytes are not shown.