Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Laryngoscope. 2014 May 30;124(0 6):S1–S7. doi: 10.1002/lary.24728

TABLE II.

Surgical Approach, Implant Type, and Electrode Location.

Total
Cochleostomy
ERW
RW
(N = 116)
(n = 38)
(n = 43)
(n = 35)
N (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) P Value
Completely in
 the scala
 tympani?
 Yes 82 (70.7) 14 (36.8) 36 (83.7) 32 (91.4) <0.001
 No 34 (29.3) 24 (63.2) 7 (16.3) 3 (8.6)
Within type
 of implant
 LW Implant
 (N = 47)
 in ST?
(n = 11) (n = 20) (n = 16)
  Yes 42 (89.4) 7 (63.6) 19 (95.0) 16 (100.0) 0.009
  No 5 (10.6) 4 (36.4) 1 (5.0) 0 (0.0)
 PM Implant
 (N = 69)
 in ST?
(n = 27) (n = 23) (n = 19)
  Yes 40 (58.0) 7 (25.9) 17 (73.9) 16 (84.2) <0.001
  No 29 (42.0) 20 (74.1) 6 (26.1) 3 (15.8)

Abbreviations: ERW = extended round window; LW = lateral wall; PM = perimodiolar; RW = round window.