Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2014 Jun 9;55(5):684–689. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.04.013

TABLE 2.

Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) for factors associated with use of a supervised injection facility (SIF) in the preceding 6 months among 414 actively injecting youth: At-Risk Youth Study (ARYS), Vancouver, British Columbia, 2005–2012.

Characteristic Unadjusted ORa (95% CI) Adjusted ORa (95% CI) p Value
Sociodemographic factors
  Age (per year older) 1.04 (0.98 – 1.10)
  Male gender 0.91 (0.63 – 1.32)
  Aboriginal ancestry 1.25 (0.85 – 1.85)
  High school educationb 1.01 (0.75 – 1.35)
  Spent time in DTESc,d 3.33 (2.51 – 4.41) 3.29 (2.38 – 4.54) <0.001
  Homelessd 1.39 (1.09 – 1.76)
  Incarceratedd 1.28 (0.98 – 1.67)
  Sex workd 1.40 (0.91 – 2.15)
Drug use-related behaviors
  Daily heroin injectiond 2.93 (2.16 – 3.97) 2.36 (1.72 – 3.24) <0.001
  Daily cocaine injectiond 3.36 (1.89 – 5.97) 2.44 (1.34 – 4.45) 0.004
  Daily crystal meth injectiond 1.46 (1.09 – 1.94) 1.62 (1.13 – 2.31) 0.008
  Overdosed 1.42 (1.05 – 1.92)
  Dealt drugsd 1.21 (0.93 – 1.58)
  Any public injectiond,e 2.61 (1.99 – 3.44) 2.08 (1.53 – 2.84) <0.001
  Needed help injectingd 1.59 (1.19 – 2.12)
  Visited crack house or shooting galleryd 1.89 (1.45 – 2.47)
  Borrowed syringed 1.41 (0.97 – 2.03)
  ‘Jacked up’ by policed 1.38 (1.07 – 1.79)
  Received drug treatmentd 1.03 (0.80 – 1.34)
a

Bolded text indicates statistical significance at p < 0.05

b

Denotes completion of or current enrollment in high school

c

Lived or spent time in the Downtown Eastside neighborhood, the area immediately surrounding Vancouver's SIF

d

During the preceding six months

e

On the street, in a public bathroom, or in a park