Table 2.
Husband | Wife | |
---|---|---|
Stressor | ||
Husband combat exposurea | .28** | .27** |
Resources | ||
Status | ||
Husband ranka | −.12* | −.10 |
Husband incomea | −.14* | −.12* |
Economic strain | .23** | .24** |
Years of education | −.06 | −.05 |
Military Experience | ||
Military family | .02 | .12 |
Husband year joined servicea | .04 | −.06 |
Support | ||
Connection with other Army families | .08 | −.00 |
Need more support | .33** | .30** |
Can get support | −.13* | −.15* |
Marital Quality | ||
Marital satisfaction | −.27** | −.31** |
Spillover | .37** | .25** |
Talk about Army | −.20** | −.21** |
Negative communication | .25** | .30** |
Children | ||
Number of children | .05 | .05 |
Child externalizing | .05 | .21** |
Child internalizing | .05 | .16* |
Perceptions | ||
Army adjustment | −.20** | −.17** |
Army concern | −.05 | −.22** |
Army value | −.04 | −.07 |
Mission value | −.26** | −.23** |
Husband report on these variables used to predict both husband and wife stress; all other variables use own report on the variable to predict own stress.
Note: Percent of variance accounted for is estimated by squaring the value of the correlation coefficient. Ns for each correlation ranged from 213 to 299.