Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 27.
Published in final edited form as: Urol Oncol. 2011 Aug 3;31(6):739–743. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.06.011

Table 4.

Comparison of repeat biopsy and final RRP pathology

Repeat biopsy
Final prostate pathology*
Cores positive, Gleason score % Cancer Grade* Cancer volume Pathologic stage
Upgraded 2/12, 3+4 1% 3+4 0.5cc, 1% pT2a
2/12, 3+4 3% 3+3 2.9cc, 5% pT2a
4/12, 3+4 8% 3+4 11.7cc, 30% pT2c
3/12, 3+4 15% 3+4 2.2cc, 5% pT2c
Average (6.8%) Average (4.3cc, 10.3%)
Elective 1/12, 3+3 8% 3+3 0.4cc, 1% pT2c
2/12, 3+3 6% 3+4 2.5cc, 5% pT2c
1/12, 3+3 10% 3+3 0.9cc, 2% PT2a
1/12, 3+3 2% 3+4 1.1cc, 2% pT2c
1/12, 3+3 5% 3+3 0.8cc, 2% pT2c
Average (6.2%) Average (1.1cc, 2.4%)
*

All margins negative at RRP; no significant difference in volume between upgraded and elective groups.