Table 4.
Comparison of repeat biopsy and final RRP pathology
| Repeat biopsy
|
Final prostate pathology*
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores positive, Gleason score | % Cancer | Grade* | Cancer volume | Pathologic stage | |
| Upgraded | 2/12, 3+4 | 1% | 3+4 | 0.5cc, 1% | pT2a |
| 2/12, 3+4 | 3% | 3+3 | 2.9cc, 5% | pT2a | |
| 4/12, 3+4 | 8% | 3+4 | 11.7cc, 30% | pT2c | |
| 3/12, 3+4 | 15% | 3+4 | 2.2cc, 5% | pT2c | |
| Average (6.8%) | Average (4.3cc, 10.3%) | ||||
| Elective | 1/12, 3+3 | 8% | 3+3 | 0.4cc, 1% | pT2c |
| 2/12, 3+3 | 6% | 3+4 | 2.5cc, 5% | pT2c | |
| 1/12, 3+3 | 10% | 3+3 | 0.9cc, 2% | PT2a | |
| 1/12, 3+3 | 2% | 3+4 | 1.1cc, 2% | pT2c | |
| 1/12, 3+3 | 5% | 3+3 | 0.8cc, 2% | pT2c | |
| Average (6.2%) | Average (1.1cc, 2.4%) | ||||
All margins negative at RRP; no significant difference in volume between upgraded and elective groups.