Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Surg. 2014 Aug;149(8):829–836. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.857

Table 3.

Net change in the rates of discretionary and non-discretionary surgery resulting from Massachusetts healthcare reform

All White Non-white Low income Newly insured
coefficient p-value %change coefficient p-value %change coefficient p-value %change coefficient p-value %change coefficient p-value %change
Discretionary 0.83 0.021 9.3% 0.95 0.003 10.6% 0.87 <0.001 19.9% 0.60 0.004 6.7% 0.86 0.017 10.6%
Non-discretionary −0.21 0.009 −4.5% −0.09 0.142 −2.2% 0.15 0.401 3.9% −0.36 <0.001 −6.3% −0.32 <0.001 −6.9%

Results of the multivariable difference-in-differences (DID) analysis showing change in rates of discretionary and non-discretionary surgery in Massachusetts compared to control states. Reform transition point is defined as July 2007. Coefficient refers to the DID estimator and % change refers to coefficient divided by pre-reform rate. Low income refers to patients residing in Massachusetts counties with low median income. Newly insured refers to patients residing in Massachusetts counties with high numbers of individuals gaining insurance from 2006–2008.