Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 27;9(10):e111259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111259

Table 2. Candidate predictors for development of prediction model for early prediction of Intensive Care Unit – acquired weakness.

candidate predictors* distribution p-value selection percentage inbootstrap samples
ICU-AW(N:103) no ICU-AW(N:109)
patient characteristics
females, n (%) 52 (50) 40 (37) 0.06 37.1
age, mean ± SD 63±15 59±16 0.08 57.6
risk factor for a polyneuropathyin medical history, n (%) 35 (34) 40 (37) 0.79 13.4
pre-existing polyneuropathy priorto ICU admission, n (%) 3 (3) 1 (1) 0.57 n.a.
systemic corticosteroid use priorto ICU admission, n (%) 7 (7) 9 (8) 0.89 10.7
clinical parameters
suspected sepsis, n (%) 78 (76) 70 (64) 0.09 14.7
unplanned admission, n (%) 85 (83) 83 (76) 0.33 10.9
presence of shock, n (%) 75 (73) 67 (61) 0.11 24.6
RASS score, median (IQR) –3 (–5 to −1) –2 (–3 to 0) <0.01 48.2
laboratory parameters
average urine production,median ml/h (IQR) 70 (20 to 122) 102(64 to 134) <0.01 14.4
highest glucose, mean mg/dl ± SD 243.8±78.5 220.5±67.3 0.02 38.5
lowest glucose, mean mg/dl ± SD 85.8±22.3 89.6±25.8 0.25 22.2
lowest pH, mean ± SD 7.21±0.1 7.25±0.1 0.02 17.3
lowest P/F ratio, median (IQR) 186 (127 to 245) 178 (134 to 246) 0.98 27.9
lowest platelet count,median×109/L (IQR) 103 (45 to 151) 127 (85 to 197) 0.01 21.0
highest lactate, median mmol/L(IQR; 17 missing) 4.5 (3.0 to 7.0) 2.8 (1.7 to 4.8) <0.01 89.5
lowest ionized Ca2+, meanmmol/L ± SD 0.97±0.11 0.98±0.13 0.53 51.6
medication
treatment with any corticosteroid,n (%) 81 (79) 63 (58) <0.01 33.9
repeated treatment with anyneuromuscular blocker§, n (%) 17 (17) 18 (17) 1.00 20.3
treatment with anyaminoglycoside, n (%) 51 (50) 30 (28) <0.01 80.4

*all clinical, laboratory and medication parameters were scored using information from the first two ICU days, except for the RASS score which was scored around two days after ICU admission;

logarithmically transformed;

§

more than one administration of any neuromuscular blocker.

ICU-AW: Intensive Care Unit – acquired weakness; RASS: Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale; n.a.: not applicable.

Table displaying distributions and differences between patients with and without Intensive Care Unit – acquired weakness for the candidate predictors. In the final column selection percentages of the candidate predictors in bootstrap samples based on backward selection are presented.