TABLE 2.
Multivariable logistic regression analysis for patients receiving neither abdominopelvic computed tomography scan nor abdominal ultrasound during the five-year follow-up period
| OR (95% CI) | P | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | ||
| <50 | Reference | |
| 50–64 | 0.97 (0.68–1.39) | 0.88 |
| 65–74 | 1.07 (0.75–1.52) | 0.73 |
| >75 | 1.21 (0.83–1.74) | 0.32 |
| Sex | ||
| Male | Reference | |
| Female | 0.85 (0.71–1.02) | 0.08 |
| Risk category | ||
| High | Reference | |
| Low | 6.99 (5.26–9.35) | <0.01 |
| Rural | ||
| No | Reference | |
| Yes | 1.00 (0.77–1.31) | 0.99 |
| Income quintile | ||
| 1 (low) | Reference | |
| 2 | 1.08 (0.81–1.43) | 0.62 |
| 3 | 0.94 (0.70–1.26) | 0.67 |
| 4 | 1.07 (0.80–1.44) | 0.63 |
| 5 (high) | 1.07 (0.80–1.43) | 0.64 |
| Local Health Integration Network | ||
| 1 | Reference | |
| 2 | 1.03 (0.70–1.52) | 0.86 |
| 3 | 1.32 (0.78–2.21) | 0.30 |
| 4 | 1.11 (0.75–1.63) | 0.60 |
| 5 | 1.90 (1.26–2.86) | <0.01 |
| 6 | 1.06 (0.74–1.52) | 0.76 |
| 7 | 1.03 (0.66–1.60) | 0.90 |
| 8 | 1.43 (0.93–2.18) | 0.10 |
| 9 | 1.14 (0.68–1.92) | 0.62 |
| 10 | 0.41 (0.16–1.07) | 0.07 |
| 11 | 2.03 (1.38–2.98) | <0.01 |
| 12 | 0.61 (0.37–0.99) | 0.05 |
| 13 | 1.20 (0.75–1.92) | 0.44 |
Bolded values indicate statistical significance