Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 12;18(5):494. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0494-0

Table 3.

In vitro diaphragm muscle contractile properties with various modes of mechanical ventilation, with and without applied positive end-expiratory airway pressure a

Control CPAP CPAP-8 AMV AMV-8 CMV CMV-8
Lo (cm) 3.2 ± 0.1 3.1 ± 0.1 3.4 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.2 3.2 ± 0.1
TPT (ms) 67 ± 3 68 ± 3 73 ± 9 71 ± 3 71 ± 2 70 ± 4 66 ± 6
RT1/2 (ms) 84 ± 4 116 ± 11 115 ± 17 98 ± 5 96 ± 5 118 ± 8 89 ± 11
Ptw (N/cm2) 7.4 ± 0.5 5.9 ± 0.5 6.0 ± 0.8 6.2 ± 0.8 7.2 ± 0.6 5.7 ± 0.9 3.7 ± 0.4b
Po (N/cm2) 24.3 ± 0.4 23.3 ± 1.0 23.0 ± 1.6 22.6 ± 0.8 23.0 ± 1.1 15.8 ± 1.0c 15.0 ± 1.1c

aValues are mean ± SE (n = 6 animals in each group). Ptw and Po are normalized for cross-sectional area (see Material and methods for calculation). AMV, Assist-control mechanical ventilation; CMV, Controlled mechanical ventilation (numerical value of 8 next to ventilatory mode denotes the set CPAP or PEEP of 8 cmH2O); CPAP, Continuous positive airway pressure; Lo, Length at which diaphragm muscle strip produced maximal isometric tension; Po, Maximum tetanic force; Ptw, Peak twitch force; RT1/2, Time required for peak twitch force to relax to one-half of peak twitch force; TPT, Time from onset of muscle contraction to peak twitch force. bFor Ptw, P < 0.01 for CMV-8 compared with control and AMV-8. cFor Po, P < 0.01 for CMV compared with control, CPAP and AMV, as well as for CMV-8 compared with control, CPAP-8 and AMV-8.