Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 17;11(10):10824–10837. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111010824

Table 3.

ANOVA results (a) and multiple comparisons among mean values and range of data variation (minimum and maximum values) for each surfaces and variables analyzed (b) after routine cleaning and sanitation of food contact surfaces.

a.
Sources of Variation df RLU TMA C
Surfaces 9 *** *** ***
Time 39 ns ns ns
Error 351
b.
Surface RLU/100 cm2 TMA cfu/100 cm2 Coliforms cfu/100 cm2 Ec cfu/100 cm2
Min Max Means * Min Max Means * Min Max Means *
Raw meat preparation table 18 1,568 183.05 b n.d. 1.1 × 104 3.6 × 102b n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
Raw meat chopping-board 41 451,593 59,548.05 a n.d. 4.8 × 105 4.1 × 104a n.d. 1.8 × 102 7.0 × 10 b n.d.
Raw meat knife 25 7,713 843.02 b n.d. 1.1 × 104 9.7 × 102b n.d. 7.3 × 102 2.0 × 10 b n.d.
Raw vegetable preparation table 35 12,695 811.37 b n.d. 8.2 × 103 7.1 × 102b n.d. 3.0 × 102 2.0 × 10 b n.d.
Raw vegetable knife 37 30,770 3,181.30 b n.d. 1.0 × 105 5.9 × 103b n.d. 1.5 × 102 1.0 × 10 b n.d.
Vegetable washer 11 3,041 332.45 b n.d. 2.3 × 104 7.1 × 102b n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
Multipurpose chopping-board 90 35,864 4,105.57 b n.d. 1.0 × 105 8.1 × 103b n.d. 4.7 × 103 2.2 × 102a n.d.
Cooked meat slicing machine 27 2,855 437.43 b n.d. 1.3 × 103 1.3 × 102b n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
Table for customers 25 4,243 526.32 b n.d. 2.2 × 102 1.0 × 10 b n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.
Knife for customers 9 934 163.95 b n.d. 2.8 × 102 1.0 × 10 b n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

Notes: In panel a: df = degrees of freedom; ns = not significant; *** = significant at p < 0.001. In panel b: * For each variable means followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) RLU Relative Light Units; TMA Total Mesophilic Aerobes; Ec Escherichia coli; n.d. not detected (no colonies were grown on plates inoculated with 1 mL of undiluted sample).