Table 1.
Authors | Year | Country | Ethnicity | Control Source | Cancer Type | Genotyping Method | Genotype distribution (case/control) | HWE (P) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
Asp/Asp | Asp/Asn | Asn/Asn | ||||||||
Zhang et al [18] | 2014 | China | Chinese | HB | ESCC | PCR-RFLP | 349/354 | 55/50 | 1/1 | 0.579 |
Huang et al [19] | 2012 | China | Chinese | HB | ESCC | PCR-RFLP | 171/298 | 42/60 | 0/0 | 0.084 |
Wang et al [20] | 2012 | China | Chinese | PB | ESCC | PCR-RFLP | 349/354 | 55/50 | 1/1 | 0.580 |
Li et al [21] | 2012 | China | Chinese | HB | ESCC | PCR-RFLP | 342/351 | 56/47 | 2/2 | 0.754 |
Wu et al [22] | 2010 | China | Chinese | PB | ESCC | PCR-Taq | 206/212 | 28/22 | 1/1 | 0.602 |
Pan et al [23] | 2009 | America | European | HB | ESCC | PCR-Taq | 137/201 | 163/185 | 43/48 | 0.581 |
Zhou et al [24] | 2007 | China | Chinese | PB | ESCC | PCR-RFLP | 279/528 | 46/82 | 2/2 | 0.527 |
Ye et al [25] | 2006 | Sweden | European | PB | ESCC | PCR-RFLP | 30/176 | 41/237 | 10/57 | 0.093 |
Yu et al [26] | 2004 | China | Chinese | HB | ESCC | PCR-RFLP | 121/136 | 14/16 | 0/0 | 0.493 |
Xing et al [27] | 2003 | China | Chinese | HB | ESCC | PCR-RFLP | 286/338 | 38/45 | 1/0 | 0.222 |
Xing et al [28] | 2002 | China | Chinese | HB | ESCC | PCR-RFLP | 381/461 | 49/62 | 3/1 | 0.467 |
Pan et al [23] | 2009 | America | European | HB | EADC | PCR-Taq | 16/201 | 20/185 | 1/48 | 0.581 |
Ye et al [25] | 2006 | Sweden | European | PB | EADC | PCR-RFLP | 31/176 | 51/237 | 14/57 | 0.093 |
Tse et al [29] | 2008 | Canada | Mixed | HB | EADC | PCR-Taq | 117/199 | 150/206 | 43/49 | 0.690 |
Liu et al [30] | 2007 | America | European | HB | EADC | PCR-RFLP | 75/144 | 92/160 | 16/32 | 0.190 |
HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; P<0.05 was considered statistically significant; PCR-RFLP, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism; ESCC, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma; EADC, Esophageal Adenocarcinoma; HB, Hospital-based; PB, Population-based; P, value for HDW.