Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Apr 28;41(4):941–953. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24641

Table 2.

DTI indices using whole muscle histogram analysis of the medial gastrocnemius (MG) and lateral gastrocnemius (LG) muscles for young (Y) and senior (S) subjects.

Medial gastrocnemius Lateral gastrocnemius
Young(Y) Senior (S) %2 Young(Y) Senior (S) %
FA1 Mean 0.2527 ± 0.0785 0.2813 ± 0.1004 11.3 0.2378 ± 0.0617 0.2419 ± 0.0707 1.7
Kurtosis 4.69 2.98 −36.4 6.67 4.01 −39.9
Skewness 0.5 0.28 −43.2 0.79 0.08 −89.9
λ 1 3 Mean 0.0018 ± 0.0004 0.0022 ± 0.0005 20.1* 0.0018 ± 0.0003 0.0021 ± 0.0003 13.7*
Kurtosis 10.07 6.54 −35.1 14.42 14.36 −0.4
Skewness 1.22 1.58 29.2 1.62 2.13 32
λ 2 3 Mean 0.0013 ± 0.0003 0.0015 ± 0.0003 16.0* 0.0014 ± 0.0002 0.0015 ± 0.0003 11.8
Kurtosis 9.74 6.56 −32.7 15.71 12.42 −20.9
Skewness 1.22 1.56 27.8 1.77 2.03 14.4
λ 3 3 Mean 0.0011 ± 0.0002 0.0012 ± 0.0003 13.9* 0.0012 ± 0.0002 0.0013 ± 0.0003 13.8*
Kurtosis 10.49 6.39 −39.1 12.96 12.37 −4.5
Skewness 0.92 1.32 43.9 1.32 1.94 47.8
1

FA: fractional anisotropy, unitless (range: 0-1)

2

% is change calculated with respect to the young group

3

Eigenvalues λ1, λ2, λ3 are in units of mm2/sec.

*

significant at p<0.05; two-tailed t-test for independent samples (young-senior age groups)