Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 29;34(44):14526–14535. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1706-14.2014

Table 1.

SPM results for main effect of cue intensitya

Cluster Region k x y z Z-score Context effect Model evidence
1 Left mid-insula 1519 −34 −2 14 5.4* −0.6 0.83
Left posterior insula −36 −20 18 4.9* −0.6 0.97
Left parietal operculum/posterior insula −54 −32 24 4.1 0.0 0.93
2 Left mid-cingulate gyrus 2887 −12 −2 44 5.4* −0.3 0.84
Left cingulate sulcus, marginal segment −14 −40 48 4.8* 0.1 0.99
Right mid-cingulate/posterior cingulate 6 −16 44 4.3 −0.4 0.97
Anterior cingulate 0 34 18 4.2 0.7 0.83
3 Right mid-insula 1827 34 8 12 4.6** 0.4 0.63
Right inferior mid-insula 38 −2 −12 4.5** 0.9 0.81
Right posterior insula 40 −14 0 4.5** −0.5 0.93
Right anterior insula 48 16 −6 3.9 0.1 0.83
4 Right inferior frontal gyrus 166 42 24 16 4.6** 2.0 0.99
5 Left intraparietal sulcus 180 −36 −62 44 4.4 0.1 >0.99
6 Left middle temporal gyrus 94 −56 −64 4 4.0 0.9 0.99
7 Left postcentral gyrus 86 −30 −28 58 4.0 −0.4 0.88
8 Right thalamus 55 8 −2 6 3.5 0.8 0.75
9 Right middle frontal gyrus 29 50 8 46 3.5 −0.8 0.99
10 Thalamus 21 0 −16 10 3.3 0.3 0.77
11b Right parieto-occipital fissure 499 8 −74 36 4.5 2.1 0.99
Left parieto-occipital fissure −10 −74 34 4.4 3.3 0.99
12b Left central sulcus 83 −34 −20 42 3.8 0.9 0.50
13b Left postcentral gyrus 25 −58 −40 46 3.8 −0.8 0.72
14b Left precentral gyrus 30 −40 −2 50 3.7 0.4 0.55
15b Right superior temporal sulcus 37 56 −52 12 3.6 0.2 0.98
16b Right intraparietal sulcus 37 36 −54 48 3.6 0.3 0.96
17b Right superior precentral sulcus 52 46 −6 50 3.4 −0.2 0.90
18b Left anterior calcarine sulcus 36 −14 −58 4 3.4 2.4 0.81
19b Right postcentral gyrus 29 16 −34 70 3.4 −1.0 0.96

aSPMs inspected at p < 0.001 uncorrected, minimum cluster size of 20 contiguous voxels. Peaks of clusters 1–10 fall within the mask used for SVC for this contrast (derived from a meta-analysis of pain-related studies).

bRemaining clusters fell outside this mask. Cluster size (k) refers to total cluster size (i.e., including voxels outside the mask where the peak falls within). “Context effect” is the z-score for the simple effect of context on medium intensity cues (medium in the context of low to medium in the context of high). “Model evidence” refers to a random effects model comparison of intensity-processing and rank-processing models, reflecting the posterior probability favoring an intensity-processing model over a rank-processing model. No peak voxels within the key regions of interest show a significant context effect, and no region shows a posterior probability favoring the rank-processing model.

*p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons across entire brain volume.

**p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons across small volume of interest.