Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 9;54(5):1102–1109. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0335-6

Table 4.

Production performance parameters for birds fed the three diets (± SE), and P values for one-way anovas are used to compare each characteristic by diet

Characteristics Diet F d.f (between, within groups) P
Control SE ± 7.5 % SE ± 15.0 % SE ±
Change in bird bodyweight (kg) −0.04a 0.02 −0.14b 0.03 −0.07ab 0.03 4.29 2,26 0.02*
Mean feed intake days 11–14 (g/bird/day) 105.13 3.33 104.33 7.19 105.47 5.34 0.01 2,26 0.99
Feed conversion (g food/g egg) 1.68 0.07 1.70 0.12 1.76 0.09 0.18 2,26 0.84
Excreta DM days 11–14 (g) 119.43 4.81 126.61 7.88 143.00 7.79 2.95 2,26 0.07
Excreta DM (%) 23.22a 0.96 26.02b 0.73 27.74b 1.25 5.29 2,26 0.01*
No. eggs/bird/day 0.99 0.01 0.99 0.01 0.98 0.01 0.26 2,26 0.77
Birds laying ≥1 egg/day (%) 98.57 0.95 98.57 0.95 98.41 1.05 0.01 2,26 0.99
Mean egg weight (g) 63.38 0.99 63.02 1.46 61.47 0.99 0.73 2,26 0.49
Mean deformation (µm) 22.00 1.26 22.50 0.87 20.22 0.79 1.36 2,26 0.28
Mean Haugh Units 108.09 1.53 106.65 1.27 111.12 1.81 2.15 2,26 0.14

Percentage values were Arcsine transformed prior to analyses. When P < 0.05, post hoc least significant difference tests were performed. Egg weight, deformation, and Haugh units were derived from eggs produced on days 11 and 12 of the trial. Letters ‘a’ and ‘b’ represent significant differences in the post hoc pairwise comparisons (Bonferroni tests)

Feed intakes are given on an ‘as fed’ wet weight basis

* Significant P value