Table 4.

Fixed effects of group comparisons for L1 Stroop RTs (based on model presented in Table 3).

	Estimate	SE	z-value
GLOBAL RTs
Monolingual vs. German	−1.762e-02	7.575e-02	−0.233
Monolingual vs. Polish	−6.752e-02	7.333e-02	−0.921
Monolingual vs. Arabic	8.815e-02	7.880e-02	1.119
German vs. Polish	4.990e-02	6.946e-02	0.718
German vs. Arabic	1.058e-01	7.568e-02	1.398
Polish vs. Arabic	1.557e-01	7.325e-02	2.125*
INTERFERENCE EFFECTS
Monolingual vs. German	−4.036e-02	5.352e-02	−0.754
Monolingual vs. Polish	−3.099e-02	5.232e-02	−0.592
Monolingual vs. Arabic	−1.123e-01	5.051e-02	−2.223*
German vs. Polish	−9.374e-03	2.978e-02	−0.315
German vs. Arabic	−7.191e-02	3.647e-02	−1.971
Polish vs. Arabic	−8.128e-02	3.453e-02	−2.354*
FACILITATION EFFECTS
Monolingual vs. German	−2.834e-02	6.725e-02	−0.421
Monolingual vs. Polish	4.069e-02	6.593e-02	0.617
Monolingual vs. Arabic	7.947e-02	6.645e-02	1.196
German vs. Polish	−6.903e-02	3.932e-02	−1.755
German vs. Arabic	1.078e-01	4.738e-02	2.276*
Polish vs. Arabic	3.878e-02	4.536e-02	0.855

Note that the monolingual comparisons are identical to those presented in Table 3. Significant effects (z > 2) are marked with an asterisk.