Table 6.

Fixed effects of group comparisons for L2 Stroop RTs (based on model presented in Table 5).

	Estimate	SE	z-value
GLOBAL RTs
Monolingual vs. German	−3.844e-02	7.548e-02	−0.509
Monolingual vs. Polish	−2.833e-02	7.394e-02	−0.383
Monolingual vs. Arabic	7.632e-02	7.709e-02	0.990
German vs. Polish	−1.011e-02	7.028e-02	−0.144
German vs. Arabic	1.148e-01	7.598e-02	1.510
Polish vs. Arabic	1.047e-01	7.382e-02	1.418
INTERFERENCE
Monolingual vs. German	−6.239e-02	5.073e-02	−1.230
Monolingual vs. Polish	−5.133e-02	5.655e-02	−0.908
Monolingual vs. Arabic	−1.013e-01	4.777e-02	−2.122*
German vs. Polish	−1.106e-02	3.331e-02	−0.332
German vs. Arabic	−3.896e-02	4.613e-02	−0.845
Polish vs. Arabic	−5.001e-02	4.744e-02	−1.054
FACILITATION
Monolingual vs. German	−1.470e-02	5.944e-02	−0.247
Monolingual vs. Polish	4.665e-02	6.601e-02	0.707
Monolingual vs. Arabic	9.329e-02	5.612e-02	1.662
German vs. Polish	−6.134e-02	3.960e-02	−1.549
German vs. Arabic	1.080e-01	5.423e-02	1.991
Polish vs. Arabic	4.664e-02	5.564e-02	0.838

Note that the monolingual comparisons are identical to those presented in Table 5. Significant effects (z > 2) are marked with an asterisk.