Table 3.
Cond. | Conv. | Biased itemsa | Unbiased itemsb | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Δ DIC | TP | Δ DIC | FP | ||||||||||
Q05 | Q50 | Q95 | Strict | Liberal | Q05 | Q50 | Q95 | Strict | Liberal | ||||
CONTINUOUS LATENT VIOLATOR | |||||||||||||
ρ(T,V) = 0.0 | No bias | 1 | 0.73 | – | – | – | – | – | −10 | 0 | 0 | 0.304 | 0.014 |
Uniform | 2 | 0.45 | −100 | −70 | −42 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −20 | 0 | 0 | 0.387 | 0.093 | |
Nonuniform | 3 | 0.67 | −110 | −70 | −40 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −20 | 0 | 0 | 0.382 | 0.063 | |
Both | 4 | 0.52 | −185 | −125 | −86 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −20 | 0 | 0 | 0.423 | 0.096 | |
ρ(T,V) = 0.5 | No bias | 5 | 0.75 | – | – | – | – | – | −10 | 0 | 0 | 0.282 | 0.020 |
Uniform | 6 | 0.74 | −80 | −50 | −27 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −20 | 0 | 0 | 0.432 | 0.081 | |
Nonuniform | 7 | 0.78 | −140 | −85 | −40 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −20 | 0 | 0 | 0.426 | 0.079 | |
Both | 8 | 0.75 | −193 | −130 | −70 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −20 | −10 | 0 | 0.528 | 0.157 | |
CONTINUOUS OBSERVED VIOLATOR | |||||||||||||
ρ(T,V) = 0.0 | No bias | 9 | 0.96 | – | – | – | – | – | −8 | −2 | 0 | 0.776 | 0.016 |
Uniform | 10 | 0.88 | −103 | −71 | −50 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −13 | −3 | 0 | 0.748 | 0.093 | |
Nonuniform | 11 | 0.89 | −110 | −71 | −44 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −12 | −3 | 0 | 0.742 | 0.079 | |
Both | 12 | 0.88 | −175 | −138 | −93 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −14 | −4 | 0 | 0.764 | 0.143 | |
ρ(T,V) = 0.5 | No bias | 13 | 0.28 | – | – | – | – | – | −8 | −2 | 0 | 0.756 | 0.030 |
Uniform | 14 | 0.07 | −68 | −52 | −34 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −14 | −2 | 0 | 0.657 | 0.171 | |
Nonuniform | 15 | 0.18 | −106 | −77 | −46 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −12 | −3 | 0 | 0.722 | 0.100 | |
Both | 16 | 0.08 | −147 | −124 | −96 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −18 | −7 | 0 | 0.750 | 0.300 | |
DICHOTOMIZED OBSERVED VIOLATOR | |||||||||||||
ρ(T,V) = 0.0 | No bias | 17 | 0.99 | – | – | – | – | – | −9 | −2 | 0 | 0.791 | 0.022 |
Uniform | 18 | 0.99 | −70 | −45 | −28 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −12 | −2 | 0 | 0.739 | 0.089 | |
Nonuniform | 19 | 0.99 | −73 | −45 | −22 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −11 | −3 | 0 | 0.737 | 0.057 | |
Both | 20 | 0.96 | −119 | −88 | −55 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −13 | −3 | 0 | 0.760 | 0.104 | |
ρ(T,V) = 0.5 | No bias | 21 | 0.69 | – | – | – | – | – | −8 | −2 | 0 | 0.775 | 0.017 |
Uniform | 22 | 0.38 | −56 | −28 | −14 | 1.000 | 0.974 | −11 | −3 | 0 | 0.758 | 0.058 | |
Nonuniform | 23 | 0.62 | −78 | −50 | 26 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −11 | −3 | 0 | 0.745 | 0.055 | |
Both | 24 | 0.32 | −118 | −84 | −54 | 1.000 | 1.000 | −16 | −4 | 0 | 0.756 | 0.131 |
Cond., Condition; Conv., proportion of converged solutions; Δ DIC denotes the difference in DIC between the reference model and the competing model;
Quantile DIC difference values (i.e., 05, 50, 95), and proportions of true positives (TP) are calculated over the converged solutions [of 1 (biased item) × 100 (replicates) = 100 solutions];
Quantile DIC values (i.e., 05, 50, 95), and proportions of false positives (FP) are calculated over the converged solutions, which are 6 (non-biased items) × 100 (replicates) = 600 solutions in Conditions 1, 5, 9, 13, 17 and 21, and 5 (non-biased items) × 100 (replicates) = 500 solutions in all other conditions.