Table 1. Summary of model scenarios.
Dog | Wild carnivore | ||||||||||
Scenario number | Scenario name | Prevalence(%) | Mean effectivecontact | Prevalence (%) | Mean effective contact | Tiger-tiger Transmission | Infectious period (days) | Mortality (mean death per infection) | Population growth (λ) | Percentagepopulationsextinctin 50 years | |
1 | Control | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | 0 | 0 | 1 | 23.5% | |
2 | Low risk dog | 1.5 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | Yes | 45 | 0.4 | 0.987 | 29.8% | |
3 | High risk dog | 5.0 | 1.66 | 0 | 0 | Yes | 45 | 0.4 | 0.958 | 66.1% | |
4 | Low risk wildlife | 0 | 0 | 0.6 | 1.65* | Yes | 45 | 0.4 | 0.984 | 33.4% | |
5 | High risk wildlife | 0 | 0 | 6.2 | 3.87 | Yes | 45 | 0.4 | 0.956 | 74.5% | |
6 | Low risk dog + wildlife | 1.5 | 0.27 | 0.6 | 1.65* | Yes | 45 | 0.4 | 0.980 | 35.7% | |
7 | High risk dog + wildlife | 5.0 | 1.66 | 6.2 | 3.87 | Yes | 45 | 0.4 | 0.955 | 79.3% | |
8 | 30 day infectious period | 1.5 | 0.27 | 0.6 | 1.65* | Yes | 30 | 0.4 | 0.995 | 30.3% | |
9 | 60 day infectious period | 1.5 | 0.27 | 0.6 | 1.65* | Yes | 60 | 0.4 | 0.966 | 40.7% | |
10 | Low mortality | 1.5 | 0.27 | 0.6 | 1.65* | Yes | 45 | 0.3 | 0.982 | 34.0% | |
11 | High mortality | 1.5 | 0.27 | 0.6 | 1.65* | Yes | 45 | 0.5 | 0.978 | 38.5% | |
12 | 3-year infection cycle | 1.5 or 5.0 | 1.66 | 0.6 or 6.2 | 3.87 | Yes | 45 | 0.4 | 0.959 | 69.1% | |
13 | 5-year infection cycle | 1.5 or 5.0 | 1.66 | 0.6 or 6.2 | 3.87 | Yes | 45 | 0.4 | 0.962 | 64.2% | |
14 | 7-year infection cycle | 1.5 or 5.0 | 1.66 | 0.6 or 6.2 | 3.87 | Yes | 45 | 0.4 | 0.964 | 61.3% | |
15 | Mean of 3 yr cycle | 2.7 | 1.66 | 2.4 | 3.87 | Yes | 45 | 0.4 | 0.961 | 67.7% | |
16 | Mean of 5 yr cycle | 2.2 | 1.66 | 1.7 | 3.87 | Yes | 45 | 0.4 | 0.963 | 66.5% | |
17 | Mean of 7 yr cycle | 2.0 | 1.66 | 1.4 | 3.87 | Yes | 45 | 0.4 | 0.963 | 65.1% |
Details of the fifteen canine distemper virus (CDV) infection scenarios used in the model simulations, used to determine tiger population growth rate (lambda, λ, calculated through 50 simulations with a founder population of 200 female and 100 male tigers) and 50-year extinction probability (calculated through 1,000 simulations as the proportion of simulations where population were reduced to zero before the run was complete).
*Derived from 3.4% of 551 kills per year comprising wild carnivore prey (30), and a median of one kill every 7.5 days (or 48.53 kills/year) (42).