Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep;93(9):876–881. doi: 10.1177/0022034514544299

Table 2.

Child-level Opportunity Loss and under High and Low Intrachild Correlation Assumptions for 1,250 Child Simulations

Mean Opportunity Loss per Child 95% Confidence Interval Percentage of Children for whom AS is Optimal Strategy* 95% Confidence Interval Mean Opportunity Loss per Child if SC Optimal* 95% Confidence Interval Mean Opportunity Loss per Child if AS Optimal* 95% Confidence Interval
High intrachild correlation $80.28 $76.39, $84.17 31% 28%, 34% $116.29 $112.67, $119.90 −$215.63 −$252.90, −$178.36
Low intrachild correlation $14.61 $12.20, $17.18 87% 85%, 89% $112.71 $103.66, $121.76 −$1.25 −$8.27, $5.78

AS = Always Seal; SC = Standard Care.

*

Optimal strategy defined as the strategy for each observation that averts the highest number of restorations or extractions (i.e., is most effective) or, with equal effectiveness, costs the least.