Table 2.
Child-level Opportunity Loss and under High and Low Intrachild Correlation Assumptions for 1,250 Child Simulations
Mean Opportunity Loss per Child | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of Children for whom AS is Optimal Strategy* | 95% Confidence Interval | Mean Opportunity Loss per Child if SC Optimal* | 95% Confidence Interval | Mean Opportunity Loss per Child if AS Optimal* | 95% Confidence Interval | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High intrachild correlation | $80.28 | $76.39, $84.17 | 31% | 28%, 34% | $116.29 | $112.67, $119.90 | −$215.63 | −$252.90, −$178.36 |
Low intrachild correlation | $14.61 | $12.20, $17.18 | 87% | 85%, 89% | $112.71 | $103.66, $121.76 | −$1.25 | −$8.27, $5.78 |
AS = Always Seal; SC = Standard Care.
Optimal strategy defined as the strategy for each observation that averts the highest number of restorations or extractions (i.e., is most effective) or, with equal effectiveness, costs the least.