Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Liver Transpl. 2014 Nov;20(11):1356–1364. doi: 10.1002/lt.23957

Table 2. Categorization of 65 match runs of heart-liver transplant recipients.

Variable* Heart “sequestered” liver, N=42 Liver “sequestered” heart, N=13** Equal priority, N=10 P-value
Heart match run position 2 (1, 4) 35 (11, 52) 3 (1, 5) <0.001
Liver match run position 138 (49, 450) 1 (1, 3) 3 (2, 6) <0.001
Difference in heart vs. liver match run rank** -134 (-45, -444) 33 (8, 49) 0 (-1, 1) <0.001
Liver recipient with MELD exceptions, N (%) 4 (9.5) 12 (92.3) 6 (60.0) <0.001
Laboratory MELD score at transplantation 15 (11,20) 10 (8,17) 13 (9,16) 0.27
Match MELD score at transplantation 15 (11,20) 29 (25,33) 26 (22,29) <0.001
Heart status at transplant <0.001
 1a, N (%) 22 (52.4) 2 (15.4) 6 (60.0)
 1b, N (%) 18 (42.9) 3 (23.1) 3 (30.0)
 2, N (%) 2 (4.8) 8 (61.5) 1 (10.0)
Liver diagnosis, N (%) <0.001
 Cardiac cirrhosis 28 (66.7) 1 (7.7) 2 (20.0)
 Amyloidosis 5 (11.9) 10 (76.9) 6 (60.0)
 Hepatitis C 0 (0.0) 1 (7.7) 1 (10.0)
 Cryptogenic cirrhosis/NASH 5 (11.9) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Other 4 (9.5) 1 (7.7) 1 (10.0)
Heart diagnosis, N (%) 0.001
 Amyloidosis 5 (11.9) 9 (69.2) 6 (60.0)
 Congenital heart disease 11 (26.2) 0 (0.0) 1 (10.0)
 Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy 10 (23.8) 0 (0.0) 1 (10.0)
 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 7 (16.7) 0 (0.0) 1 (10.0)
 Other 9 (21.4) 4 (30.8) 1 (10.0)
Age at transplant 47 (35-55) 50 (46-60) 60 (42-64) 0.09
*

Median (IQR) unless otherwise specified

**

Difference in heart vs. liver match run rank was the difference between an individual transplant recipient's rank on the heart match run subtracted by their rank on the liver match run

***

In 5 cases, the H-L recipient bypassed the heart match completely