Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Liver Transpl. 2014 Nov;20(11):1356–1364. doi: 10.1002/lt.23957

Table 4.

Matched candidate approach #1: Stratified Cox model of waitlist removal for liver waitlist candidates bypassed by H-L recipients when the heart sequestered the liver versus controls selected by match MELD score*

Variable Hazard ratio P-value
Bypassed waitlist candidate 0.56 (0.40-0.79) 0.001
Age at waitlisting 1.02 (1.01-1.03) 0.001
Exception MELD score 0.11 (0.07-0.16) <0.001
Race/ethnicity 0.87
 White 1
 Black 0.93 (0.71-1.23)
 Hispanic 0.92 (0.68-1.23)
 Asian 0.79 (0.44-1.40)
 Other 0.82 (0.25-2.70)
Diagnosis 0.41
 Hepatitis C 1
 Alcohol 0.81 (0.63-1.03)
 Hepatitis B 1.09 (0.63-1.87)
 NASH/cryptogenic 0.98 (0.76-1.27)
 Cholestatic 1.00 (0.75-1.33)
 Autoimmune 1.16 (0.71-1.91)
 Other 1.01 (0.72-1.42)
 Fulminant hepatic failure 1.52 (0.94-2.48)
*

Controls were liver waitlist candidates matched 8:1 based on blood type, match MELD score, and UNOS region of bypass liver waitlist candidate. Interaction of exception points and bypass candidate versus control was not significant (p=0.8).

Binary yes/no (1/0) as to whether match MELD score was based on exception points.