Table 1.
Lesion‐behavior relation detection results of SVR‐LSM and VLSM using different synthetic lesion‐behavior relations generated with different relation weights for the a priori ROIs
| Weights for ROIs | {1, 1, 1} | {1, 2, 1} | {1, 1, 2} | {2, 1, 1} | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVR‐LSM (dTLVC) | AUC value | 0.9405 | 0.8961 | 0.8713 | 0.9036 | |
| Mean β‐value | ROI‐l | 4.2782 | 3.034 | 2.1938 | 6.1869 | |
| ROI‐2 | 4.8871 | 6.8202 | 2.8001 | 3.4520 | ||
| ROI‐3 | 5.2198 | 4.0095 | 5.8688 | 3.5301 | ||
| VLSM (dTLVC) | AUC value | 0.7052 | 0.6185 | 0.8072 | 0.6478 | |
| Mean z‐value | ROI‐l | 4.4511 | 3.8026 | 3.5386 | 5.6773 | |
| ROI‐2 | 4.4520 | 6.5614 | 2.9188 | 3.7504 | ||
| ROI‐3 | 1.4795 | 0.3437 | 3.4840 | 0.8626 | ||
| SVR‐LSM (no dTLVC) | AUC value | 0.7574 | 0.6793 | 0.8322 | 0.7188 | |
| Mean β‐value | ROI‐l | 7.4194 | 5.9060 | 6.7722 | 7.8349 | |
| ROI‐2 | 8.1215 | 8.6247 | 6.7665 | 6.8357 | ||
| ROI‐3 | 3.8664 | 2.1706 | 6.5550 | 2.7985 | ||
| VLSM (no dTLVC) | AUC value | 0.7227 | 0.6403 | 0.8421 | 0.6829 | |
| Mean z‐value | ROI‐l | 7.4312 | 6.5513 | 5.9898 | 8.6966 | |
| ROI‐2 | 8.1426 | 9.5399 | 5.8576 | 7.3014 | ||
| ROI‐3 | 3.4899 | 2.1608 | 5.8486 | 2.7169 | ||