Skip to main content
Journal of Optometry logoLink to Journal of Optometry
. 2014 Jan 22;7(4):225–228. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2013.12.006

Acute eclipse retinopathy: A small case series

Retinopatía aguda causada por eclipse: pequeña serie de casos

Nur Khatib 1, Boris Knyazer 1, Tova Lifshitz 1, Jaime Levy 1,
PMCID: PMC4213866  PMID: 25323644

Abstract

We present four young patients with acute severe solar retinopathy after observation of the total eclipse on January 4, 2011 without appropriate eye protection. Funduscopic findings were accompanied by optical coherence tomography (OCT) investigation of the macula. All our patients were young (range 14–29 years). In three of the four patients we have been able to repeat OCT evaluation revealing that the retinal changes were reversible, but delineating mild pathology in the retinal pigment epithelium and photoreceptors. Best-corrected visual acuity in the fourth case was 6/24. In addition, macular edema, which has been previously described in literature, could not be demonstrated by OCT. In the two cases we performed an early fluorescein angiogram, no pathology was seen.

Keywords: Solar retinopathy, Optical coherence tomography, Visual loss, Fluorescein angiography, Retina

Introduction

Visual deterioration caused by watching a solar eclipse has been recognized from the time of Plato. Solar retinopathy is a well-recognized clinical entity of retinal damage caused by viewing the sun, induced by a photochemical process that may be enhanced by elevated tissue temperature. Although most cases are commonly attributed to solar eclipse viewing, damage from sun gazing has also been described in religious ritual participants, military personnel, people with mental disturbances, sunbathers and forced sun gazing.1–7 As demonstrated in histopathological studies of solar retinal lesions, sun gazing causes fine structural anomalies in the outer segments of the photoreceptors and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells of the macula.8 Symptoms usually develop within 1–4 h after exposure and include decreased vision, metamorphopsia, micropsia, and central or paracentral scotomas. Fundus examination typically shows a small yellow spot with a surrounding gray zone in the foveolar or parafoveolar area. Spontaneous evolution leads to the improvement of visual acuity.9–11

We present four young patients with acute severe solar retinopathy after observation of the total eclipse on January 4, 2011 without appropriate eye protection. Funduscopic findings were accompanied by optical coherence tomography (OCT) investigation of the macula.

Patient descriptions

Case 1

A 29-year-old man presented with complaints of blurred vision affecting the right eye. The onset of symptoms was one day prior to presentation, when he had gazed at the eclipse without eye protection for a few minutes. On initial examination the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/12 OD and 6/6 OS. Slit lamp fundus examination showed a small foveal defect in the right eye. Fluorescein angiography (FA) appeared normal with no hyperfluorescence. Spectral domain OCT (3D OCT-2000 Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) showed a small disruption in the inner segment-outer segment (IS/OS) band in the right fovea (Fig. 1A) and no abnormalities in the left eye. One week later BCVA was 6/9. Three months later BCVA returned to 6/6. No pigment abnormalities were observed in the right macula.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of cases at presentation. In case 1 (A, spectral domain 3D OCT-2000, Topcon, Tokyo, Japan), there is a small disruption in the inner segment-outer segment (IS/OS) band in the fovea. In case 2 (B, time-domain Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, USA), a hyper-reflective area in the fovea affecting all retinal layers without increase in retinal thickness is detected. In case 3 (C, time-domain Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, USA), a small hyper-reflective area at the fovea can be appreciated. In case 4 (D, time-domain Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, USA), there is a defect in the inner hyper-reflective layer of the fovea.

Case 2

A 29-year-old woman presented with complaints of central scotoma and blurred vision of the right eye after watching the eclipse without eye protection two days before seeking examination. According to the patient, the exposure time was just a few seconds. On presentation BCVA was 6/12 OD and 6/6 OS. Fundus examination showed a small yellow round lesion in the fovea of right eye. Time-domain OCT (Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) examination of the right eye showed a hyper-reflective area in the fovea affecting all retinal layers without increase in retinal thickness (Fig. 1B). FA was normal bilaterally. One month after the exposure BCVA was 6/6. Six months after the exposure BCVA remained 6/6. A small reddish demarcated spot was detected at the fovea. The revised OCT showed a very small hypo-reflective area at the inner hyper-reflective layer in the center of fovea.

Case 3

A 13-year-old female presented 48 h after direct viewing of the eclipse for a few seconds with both eyes opened. BCVA was 6/6 in both eyes. Fundus examination of both eyes did not show any pathology. Time-domain OCT (Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) showed a small hyper-reflective area at the right fovea (Fig. 1C) that returned to normal three weeks later. BCVA remained 6/6 without subjective complaints.

Case 4

A 14-year-old girl came to our Emergency Department four days after watching the solar eclipse, reporting blurred vision in the right eye. BCVA was 6/24 OD and 6/6 OS. A right central foveal defect was seen on examination. Time-domain OCT (Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) showed a defect in the inner hyper-reflective layer of the right fovea (Fig. 1D). One year after the exposure, BCVA remains 6/24 and pigmentary foveal changes are seen clinically.

Discussion

Solar retinopathy is characterized by involvement of the outermost layers of retina. The RPE absorbs an important percentage of solar radiations with an ensuing increase of tissue temperature in surrounding areas, thus producing thermal damage. On the other hand high energy waves and low levels of ultraviolet A (UVA) or radiations close to UVA (320–400 nm) are responsible for photochemical damage. It is generally believed that retinal involvement could be the result of the combination of thermal and photochemical damage. Solar radiation produces pointed damage in apical melanosomes of the RPE followed by alterations in the outermost segment of foveal photoreceptors.12–14

Solar retinopathy presents soon after initial exposure, with symptoms including reduced visual acuity, central scotomas, chromatopsia, photophobia, and metamorphosia. It is acutely characterized by a yellow foveolar lesion upon fundus examination. The main reported OCT finding was a hyper-reflective area involving all foveolar retinal layers without showing any sign of retinal edema. It correlates in size and location with the characteristic funduscopically visible yellow dot. At present, the origin of this well delineated area of hyper-reflectivity is unclear.11

All our patients were young (range 14–29 years). In three of the four patients we have been able to repeat OCT investigation revealing that the retinal changes were reversible, but delineating mild pathology in the retinal pigment epithelium and photoreceptors. BCVA in the fourth case remained 6/24. In addition, macular edema, which has been previously described in literature, could not be demonstrated by OCT. In the two cases we performed an early FA and no pathology was seen.

Recently fundus autofluorescence (FAF) has emerged as complementary non-invasive diagnostic tool in the management of retinal disease. FAF is based on the autofluorescent properties of retinal fluorophores, such as lipofuscin, which is mainly located in the RPE.13 Reduced content of lipofuscin in the RPE has been described in cases of light-induced loss of photoreceptors. In cases with presumed idiopathic outer lamellar defects at the fovea, e.g. chronic solar retinopathy, there is a characteristic autofluorescence pattern consisting of small areas of decreased autofluorescence, corresponding in location to the outer lamellar defects, surrounded by a ring of faint increased autofluorescence in the context of the relatively hypoautofluorescent macular area.15–20

This case series show that direct eclipse viewing without adequate eye protection can result in acute solar retinopathy. Public awareness and educational campaigns are essential. Permanent visual loss is still an area of concern. In many cases the changes are reversible, but solar retinopathy can lead to lasting visual impairment (case 2). OCT is an excellent modality for demonstrating macular pathology caused by solar retinopathy, and is superior to FA in demonstrating these changes. OCT can detect subclinical retinal changes as seen in case 3.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Chen R.W., Gorczynska I., Srinivasan V.J., Fujimoto J.G., Duker J.S., Reichel E. High-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography findings in chronic solar retinopathy. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2008;2:103–105. doi: 10.1097/ICB.0b013e3181506993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bechmann M., Ehrt O., Thiel M.J., Kristin N., Ulbig M.W., Kampik A. Optical coherence tomography findings in early solar retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:547–548. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.5.546b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gulkilik G., Taskapili M., Kocabora S., Demirci G., Muftuoglu G.I. Association between visual acuity loss and optical coherence tomography findings in patients with late solar retinopathy. Retina. 2009;29:257–261. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31818a2105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hope-Ross M., Travers S., Mooney D. Solar retinopathy following religious rituals. Br J Ophthalmol. 1988;72:931–934. doi: 10.1136/bjo.72.12.931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Källmark F.P., Ygge J. Photo-induced foveal injury after viewing a solar eclipse. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005;83:586–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00511.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Devadason D.S., Mahmood S., Stanga P.E., Bishop P.N. Solar retinopathy in a patient with bipolar affective disorder. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:247. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.078550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Polat J., Feinberg E., Crosby S.S. Ocular manifestations of torture: solar retinopathy as a result of forced solar gazing. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:1406–1407. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.171595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hope-Ross M.W., Mahon G.J., Gardiner T.A., Archer D.B. Ultrastructural findings in solar retinopathy. Eye. 1993;7:29–33. doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gass J.D.M. 4th ed. vol. 2. Mosby; St Louis: 1997. pp. 760–763. (Stereoscopic atlas of macular diseases). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Penner R., McNair J.N. Eclipse blindness. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966;61:1452–1457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tso M.O.M., LaPianna F.G. The human fovea after sungazing. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1975;79:788–795. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Garg S.J., Martidis A., Nelson M.L., Sivalingam A. Optical coherence tomography of chronic solar retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:351–354. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00876-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Parver D.L. Mosby Elsevier; New York: 2006. Ocular phototoxicity. Retinal imaging; pp. 421–426. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wu J., Seregard S., Algvere P.V. Photochemical damage of the retina. Surv Ophthalmol. 2006;51:461–481. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2006.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bruè C., Mariotti C., De Franco E., Fisher Y., Guidotti J.M., Giovannini A. Solar retinopathy: a multimodal analysis. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. 2013;2013:906920. doi: 10.1155/2013/906920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.dell’Omo R., Konstantopoulou K., Wong R., Pavesio C. Presumed idiopathic outer lamellar defects of the fovea and chronic solar retinopathy: an OCT and fundus autofluorescence study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1483–1487. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.157719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Symons R.C., Mainster M.A., Goldberg M.F. Solar maculopathy in a young child. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:1258–1259. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.154450. 1269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li K.H., Chen S.N., Hwang J.F., Lin C.J. Unusual optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence findings of eclipse retinopathy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012;60:561–563. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.103799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Charbel Issa P., Fleckenstein M., Scholl H.P., Holz F.G., Meyer C.H. Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy findings in chronic solar retinopathy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008;39:497–499. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20081101-04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Framme C., Roider J., Sachs H.G., Brinkmann R., Gabe V.B. Noninvasive imaging monitoring of retinal pigment epithelium patterns using fundus autofluorescence – review. Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2005;1:89–103. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Optometry are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES