Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 16;70(3):225–229. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.06.016

Table 2.

Distribution of study participants based on Seropositivity for Hepatitis A and E virus.

Training centre Station Presence of IgG antibody [N (%) 95% CI]
Against Hepatitis A (n = 3974)a Against Hepatitis E (n = 3992)b
I Ahmadnagar 372 (97.89) 95.89, 99.09 67 (17.63) 13.93, 21.84
II Bengaluru 370 (100.00) 99.00, 100.00 3 (0.81) 0.17, 02.35
III Bareilly 332 (94.05) 91.05, 96.28 2 (22.16) 18.03, 26.74
IV Pune 373 (92.10) 89.03, 94.53 42 (10.34) 07.56, 13.73
V Jabalpur 323 (86.83) 82.96, 90.09 31 (8.36) 05.75, 11.65
VI Jabalpur 315 (86.36) 81.34, 88.81 45 (12.20) 09.84, 15.98
VII Lucknow 337 (95.74) 93.07, 97.60 32 (8.96) 06.21, 12.42
VIII Namkum 366 (95.31) 92.69, 97.20 21 (5.47) 03.42, 08.24
IX Pune 321 (84.25) 80.20, 87.76 50 (13.08) 09.87, 16.88
X Roorkee 332 (94.05) 91.05, 96.28 82 (22.16) 18.03, 26.74
XI Shillong 242 (94.90) 91.44, 97.26 7 (3.00) 01.22, 06.09
TOTAL 3683 (92.68) 91.82, 93.47 681(17.05) 15.90, 18.26
a

201 samples for Hep A.

b

183 for Hep E were either inadequate/haemolysed during processing of blood samples.