Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep;11(7):1064–1074. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201404-161OC

Table 1.

Template for cost-minimization analysis based on various approaches

  Third-Party Approach OSA Prediction Tool
Cost A: HST (US$) 174.00 [Sen(Prev) + (1 – Spec)(1 – Prev)] × 174
Cost B: In-lab PSG (US$) [Prev(1 – Sen) + Spec(1 – Prev)] × 607
Cost C: In-lab PSG for patients with negative HST (US$) (1 – Prev) × 607.00 [(1 – Prev) × (1 – Spec)] × 607.00
Total cost (US$) Cost A + cost B + cost C Cost A + cost B + cost C
Savings per patient with prediction tool (US$) Total cost of OSA prediction tool less total cost of third-party approach
Total savings per year extrapolated to U.S. population Savings per patient × 1,340,413*

Definition of abbreviations: HST, home sleep test; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; PPV, positive predictive value for a given population was calculated as (Sen × Prev)/[(Sen × Prev) + (1 – Spec) × (1 – Prev)]; Prev, prevalence of OSA; PSG, polysomnography; Sen, sensitivity; Spec, specificity.

*

Based on 427 PSGs performed per 10,000 population/year.