Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 30;8(10):e3172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003172

Table 2. Relative risks (RR) and respective 95% CI for the effect of interventions on the 18-month cumulative incidence of infection, using both intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.

Intent-to-treat analysis
Intervention group RRa 95% CI p-value RRb 95% CI p-value
Insecticide spraying 0.76 0.54–1.05 0.094 0.86 0.63–1.16 0.310
Dog culling 0.60 0.40–0.90 0.014 0.62 0.42–0.91 0.015
Dog culling+Insecticide spraying 0.69 0.45–1.06 0.087 0.75 0.51–1.11 0.153
Control 1.00
a

Crude.

b

Adjusted for sex, age, baseline prevalence of infection, years of living in the residence, presence of a chicken shed in the peridomestic environment, literacy of the household head and the presence of a kennel in the peridomestic environment.