Table 2. Indices of genetic diversity for the seven S. avenae populations of China sampled in 2012.
Beijing | Hubei | Hebei | Henan | Jiangsu | Shandong | Shanxi | |
N | 40 | 35 | 36 | 32 | 36 | 31 | 36 |
HS | 0.390 | 0.530 | 0.487 | 0.741 | 0.637 | 0.728 | 0.546 |
Na | 6.0 | 7.6 | 6.8 | 15.2 | 13.0 | 13.0 | 7.2 |
Ar | 3.65 | 4.35 | 3.69 | 8.36 | 6.11 | 7.15 | 4.10 |
FIS | −0.075 | 0.027 | 0.036 | 0.079 | 0.003 | 0.122 | −0.413 |
HO | 0.42 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.85 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.77 |
HE | 0.39 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.92 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.54 |
MLG | 37 | 31 | 25 | 29 | 36 | 31 | 26 |
K | 0.925 | 0.886 | 0.694 | 0.906 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.722 |
within | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
among | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
HO, observed heterozygosity; HE, expected heterozygosity; HS, gene diversity; Na, mean numbers of alleles; Ar, allelic richness based on eight samples per population; MLGs, number of multilocus genotypes; #within, number of MLGs shared within a population; #among, number of MLGs shared among populations; K, index of global genotypic diversity (MLGs /N); FIS, the inbreeding index. The seven populations were named by their sampling locations, Beijing, Hubei, Hebei, Henan, Jiangsu, Shandong, and Shanxi, respectively.