. 2014 Oct 30;9(10):e110756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110756

Table 4. Results of simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses for male diabetes in Bangladesh.

		IM	IIM	IIIM	IVM	VM	VIM	VIIM	VIIIM	IXM	XM	XIM
Residence	City corporation vs rural (OR)	2.13 ^***	-	2.21 ^***	1.58 ^*	1.59 ^*	1.39	1.41	1.33	1.13	1.08	1.06
	95% CI	1.52–3.00		1.55–3.15	1.09–2.30	1.10–2.32	0.95–2.04	0.96–2.08	0.90–1.97	0.75–1.69	0.72–1.63	0.70–1.60
	Urban vs rural (OR)	1.54 ^***	-	1.62 ^***	1.37 ^*	1.37 ^*	1.22	1.23	1.19	1.07	1.04	1.04
	95% CI	1.18–1.99		1.24–2.11	1.04–1.80	1.04–1.80	0.92–1.63	0.92–1.63	0.89–1.59	0.79–1.45	0.76–1.41	0.76–1.41
Region	Barisal vs Dhaka (OR)	-	1.15	1.31	1.27	1.26	1.34	1.38	1.37	1.34	1.38	1.39
	95% CI		0.73–1.81	0.83–2.09	0.80–2.03	0.79–2.01	0.84–2.15	0.86–2.21	0.85–2.19	0.83–2.18	0.85–2.25	0.86–2.26
	Chittagong vs Dhaka (OR)	-	1.46 ^**	1.51 ^**	1.59 ^**	1.59 ^**	1.61 ^**	1.57 ^**	1.57 ^**	1.53 ^**	1.53 ^**	1.54 ^**
	95% CI		1.09–1.95	1.12–2.03	1.18–2.16	1.17–2.15	1.19–2.18	1.16–2.14	1.16–2.13	1.11–2.09	1.12–2.10	1.13–2.11
	Khulna vs Dhaka (OR)	-	0.68 ^*	0.75	0.75	0.76	0.76	0.75	0.81	0.75	0.76	0.75
	95% CI		0.46–0.99	0.51–1.10	0.51–1.11	0.51–1.12	0.51–1.12	0.51–1.12	0.54–1.21	0.50–1.14	0.50–1.14	0.50–1.13
	Rajshahi vs Dhaka (OR)	-	0.91	1.10	1.12	1.12	1.15	1.14	1.18	1.20	1.22	1.22
	95% CI		0.65–1.27	0.78–1.55	0.79–1.58	0.79–1.59	0.81–1.63	0.80–1.62	0.83–1.69	0.83–1.73	0.85–1.75	0.85–1.75
	Rangpur vs Dhaka (OR)	-	0.78	0.91	0.98	0.97	1.01	0.98	1.06	1.02	1.01	0.99
	95% CI		0.54–1.13	0.62–1.34	0.66–1.43	0.66–1.42	0.69–1.49	0.66–1.46	0.71–1.58	0.68–1.54	0.67–1.53	0.66–1.50
	Sylhet vs Dhaka (OR)	-	1.19	1.37	1.50	1.49	1.51	1.49	1.46	1.45	1.44	1.44
	95% CI		0.76–1.88	0.87–2.18	0.94–2.39	0.94–2.37	0.95–2.20	0.93–2.37	0.91–2.33	0.90–2.32	0.90–2.30	0.90–2.31
Age	45–54 vs 35–44 (OR)	-	-	1.47 ^**	1.58 ^**	1.59 ^**	1.59 ^**	1.54 ^**	1.54 ^**	1.55 ^**	1.55 ^**	1.52 ^**
	95% CI			1.10–1.96	1.18–2.11	1.19–2.12	1.19–2.13	1.15–2.06	1.15–2.06	1.15–2.08	1.15–2.09	1.13–2.05
	55–64 vs 35–44 (OR)	-	-	2.49 ^***	2.57 ^***	2.56 ^***	2.51 ^***	2.22 ^***	2.21 ^***	2.28 ^***	2.27 ^***	2.21 ^***
	95% CI			1.83–3.38	1.89–3.51	1.88–3.50	1.84–3.43	1.60–3.06	1.60–3.05	1.64–3.18	1.63–3.17	1.58–3.09
	65+ vs 35–44 (OR)	-	-	1.75 ^***	2.13 ^***	2.05 ^***	2.04 ^***	1.55 ^*	1.56 ^*	1.66 ^*	1.66 ^*	1.57 ^*
	95% CI			1.27–2.41	1.54–2.96	1.47–2.85	1.46–2.84	1.05–2.30	1.06–2.30	1.12–2.47	1.12–2.47	1.05–2.35
Education	1–5 vs no (OR)	-	-	-	1.30	1.30	1.26	1.25	1.26	1.22	1.23	1.23
	95% CI				0.98–1.73	0.98–1.74	0.94–1.68	0.93–1.67	0.95–1.69	0.91–1.65	0.91–1.66	0.91–1.66
	6–10 vs no (OR)	-	-	-	1.42 ^*	1.42 ^*	1.28	1.23	1.26	1.16	1.13	1.12
	95% CI				1.05–1.92	1.05–1.92	0.94–1.75	0.90–1.68	0.92–1.72	0.84–1.60	0.81–1.58	0.80–1.57
	11+ vs no (OR)	-	-	-	3.24 ^***	3.24 ^***	2.80 ^***	2.73 ^***	2.81 ^***	2.42 ^***	2.32 ^***	2.25 ^***
	95% CI				2.34–4.49	2.33–4.48	1.99–3.92	1.94–3.84	1.99–3.96	1.69–3.46	1.60–3.38	1.54–3.28
Currently married	Yes vs no (OR)	-	-	-	-	0.59 ^*	0.58 ^*	0.71	0.70	0.72	0.73	0.75
	95% CI					0.35–0.99	0.34–0.98	0.41–1.22	0.40–1.21	0.40–1.28	0.41–1.30	0.43–1.33
Having TV	Yes vs no (OR)	-	-	-	-		1.45 ^**	1.42 ^**	1.45 ^**	1.41 ^**	1.36	1.37
	95% CI						1.13–1.86	1.10–1.82	1.13–1.87	1.09–1.83	0.97–1.91	0.98–1.93
Currently working	Yes vs no (OR)	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.63 ^**	0.64 ^**	0.64 ^*	0.65 ^*	0.66 ^*
	95% CI							0.45–0.88	0.46–0.89	0.46–0.91	0.46–0.91	0.47–0.93
Having bicycle	Yes vs no (OR)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.79	0.81	0.82	0.82
	95% CI								0.61–1.03	0.62–1.05	0.63–1.08	0.62–1.08
BMI	Underwght. vs normal (OR)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0.83	0.83	0.85
	95% CI									0.59–1.15	0.60–1.16	0.61–1.19
	Overwht./obese vs normal (OR)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1.85 ^***	1.83 ^***	1.77 ^***
	95% CI									1.34–2.55	1.32–2.53	1.28–2.46
Wealth index	Poor vs middle (OR)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1.33	1.34
	95% CI										0.91–1.95	0.92–1.95
	Rich vs middle (OR)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1.41	1.38
	95% CI										0.96–2.06	0.94–2.03
Hypertension	Yes vs no (OR)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1.30 ^*
	95% CI											1.00–1.69

***p≤0.001;

**p≤0.01;

*p≤0.05.