Table A1.
Network data in the Liuzhou PLACE-RDS Study
| Recruiting participants’ reports about invited and uninvited alters | Participant’s report about self | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDS | RDS | PLACE | |||
| Individual network items | |||||
| Individual attributes | Age | √ | √ | √ | |
| Marital status, education | √ | √ | √ | ||
| Where/how solicits clients | √ | √ | √ | ||
| Condom use | √ | √ | √ | ||
| Properties of Relation | Place where usually meet alter | √ | |||
| Frequency of contact | √ | ||||
| Type | √ | ||||
| Intensity | √ | ||||
| Repertoire of relation | Reason why you invited this person? | √ | |||
| Reason why you did not invite these person(s) | √ | ||||
| Aggregated network items | # of known FSWs | √ | √ | ||
| # of known FSWs you would invite to the study | √ | ||||
| # of known FSWs who solicit clients at your main site | √ | √ | |||
| # of known FSWs who solicit clients elsewhere by site type and distance (within a 10 min walk and beyond a 10 min walk) | √ | √ | |||
| # of known sex workers who are also known by your recruiter | √ | ||||
| Venue where solicits clients | Name | √ | √ | ||
| Type | √ | √ | |||
| Physical location (latitude and longitude) | √ | √ | |||