Abstract
Amoeba-resistant Aeromonas veronii ARB3 and Aeromonas media ARB13 and ARB20, which may be important intracellular pathogens of eukaryotic hosts, were isolated from pond and river waters. The draft genome sequences indicate that the strains harbor multiple protein secretion systems and toxins that induce disruption of the actin cytoskeleton.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
The genus Aeromonas has been isolated from diverse aquatic environments, including rivers, lakes, ponds, seawater (estuaries), drinking water, and groundwater (1). Some species are virulent in various living organisms, such as protozoa, worms, fish, mice, and humans (2–4). Thus, assessing the virulence of Aeromonas bacteria is challenging with respect to their clinical importance (5).
The interactions between free-living amoebae and parasitic bacteria exhibit similar processes to those that occur during the infection of mammalian cells by intracellular pathogens (6). Thus, amoebae may represent a good model for the development of resistance to macrophage digestion, which is often required for mammalian infection, and they represent environmental reservoirs of intracellular pathogens. The genetic organization of amoeba-resistant bacteria may provide new insights into the host–microbe interactions of potential human pathogens (7). We isolated amoeba-resistant strains A. veronii ARB3 from pond water and A. media ARB13 and ARB20 from river water, where Acanthamoeba castellanii ATCC 30234 was the host, and we present their draft genomes.
The draft genomes were sequenced by 100-bp paired-end sequencing on an Illumina Hiseq2000 sequencing system (Hokkaido System Science Co. Ltd., Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan). High-quality sequence reads (23,819,920; 23,697,747; and 23,523,332) were assembled de novo using CLC Genomics Workbench v6.5 (CLCbio, Cambridge, MA, USA). The sequenced reads were mapped again to the contigs. Approximately 98.8% to 99.1% of the base reads were mapped to the updated contigs. The final assembly of the genome produced 4,542,657 bp in 63 contigs with an average length of 72,106 bp and a 58.8% G+C content for ARB3; 4,612,357 bp in 180 contigs with an average length of 25,624 bp and a 61.0% G+C content for ARB13; and 4,620,096 bp in 185 contigs with an average length of 24,973 bp and a 61.0% G+C content for ARB20. The assembled contigs were functionally annotated using the RAST annotation server (8). The genomes contained 4,017 putative coding sequences (CDSs) (76.9%) and 87 tRNA and rRNA genes for ARB3, 4,200 putative CDSs and 96 tRNA and rRNA genes for ARB13, and 4,216 putative CDSs and 99 tRNA and rRNA genes for ARB20.
The genomes of the amoeba-resistant Aeromonas spp. encode several potential colonization and virulence factors, particularly secretion systems and effectors. All three strains possess the type I secretion system (T1SS) for aggregation; T1SS-secreted agglutinin repeat-in-toxin (RTX) toxins, which cause cell rounding and actin depolymerization by covalently cross-linking actin monomers into multimers (9); the type II general secretion system (T2SS) and hemolysin; and the effector VgrG, which disrupts the actin cytoskeleton via ADP ribosylation of actin (10). T2SS is responsible for secreting hemolysin into the extracellular space in A. hydrophila (11). ARB3 also possesses the type III secretion system (T3SS) and type VI secretion system (T6SS). Both T3SS and T6SS are known to be important for virulence in Aeromonas spp. (3, 10, 12). The secreted toxins may disrupt the actin cytoskeleton in amoeboid cells.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The draft genome sequences of the Aeromonas strains have been deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers JRBE00000000, JRBF00000000, and JRBG00000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (24117522).
We thank Tomomi Saeki and Chika Matsushima for technical assistance during this work.
Footnotes
Citation Kenzaka T, Nakahara M, Higuchi S, Maeda K, Tani K. 2014. Draft genome sequences of amoeba-resistant Aeromonas spp. isolated from aquatic environments. Genome Announc. 2(5):e01115-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01115-14.
REFERENCES
- 1. Janda JM, Abbott SL. 2010. The genus Aeromonas: taxonomy, pathogenicity, and infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 23:35–73. 10.1128/CMR.00039-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. González-Serrano CJ, Santos JA, García-López ML, Otero A. 2002. Virulence markers in Aeromonas hydrophila and Aeromonas veronii biovar sobria isolates from freshwater fish and from a diarrhoea case. J. Appl. Microbiol. 93:414–419. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01705.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bomar L, Stephens WZ, Nelson MC, Velle K, Guillemin K, Graf J. 2013. Draft genome sequence of Aeromonas veronii Hm21, a symbiotic isolate from the medicinal leech digestive tract. Genome Announc. 1(5):e00800-13. 10.1128/genomeA.00800-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Li Y, Liu Y, Zhou Z, Huang H, Ren Y, Zhang Y, Li G, Zhou Z, Wang L. 2011. Complete genome sequence of Aeromonas veronii strain B565. J. Bacteriol. 193:3389–3390. 10.1128/JB.00347-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Froquet R, Cherix N, Burr SE, Frey J, Vilches S, Tomas JM, Cosson P. 2007. Alternative host model to evaluate Aeromonas virulence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:5657–5659. 10.1128/AEM.00908-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Molmeret M, Horn M, Wagner M, Santic M, Abu Kwaik Y. 2005. Amoebae as training grounds for intracellular bacterial pathogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:20–28. 10.1128/AEM.71.1.20-28.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Moliner C, Fournier PE, Raoult D. 2010. Genome analysis of microorganisms living in amoebae reveals a melting pot of evolution. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 34:281–294. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00209.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, Dejongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Cordero CL, Kudryashov DS, Reisler E, Satchell KJ. 2006. The actin cross-linking domain of the Vibrio cholerae RTX toxin directly catalyzes the covalent cross-linking of actin. J. Biol. Chem. 281:32366–32374. 10.1074/jbc.M605275200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Suarez G, Sierra JC, Erova TE, Sha J, Horneman AJ, Chopra AK. 2010. A type VI secretion system effector protein, VgrG1, from Aeromonas hydrophila that induces host cell toxicity by ADP ribosylation of actin. J. Bacteriol. 192:155–168. 10.1128/JB.01260-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Maltz M, Graf J. 2011. The type II secretion system is essential for erythrocyte lysis and gut colonization by the leech digestive tract symbiont Aeromonas veronii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:597–603. 10.1128/AEM.01621-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Silver AC, Kikuchi Y, Fadl AA, Sha J, Chopra AK, Graf J. 2007. Interaction between innate immune cells and a bacterial type III secretion system in mutualistic and pathogenic associations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:9481–9486. 10.1073/pnas.0700286104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]