Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 9;21(6):1001–1008. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002627

Table 2.

Eligible providers’ EHR behavior

Median per provider (25th percentile–75th percentile) Jan–Jun 2013 only
Metric All years* 2010 2011 2012 Jan–Jun 2013 p for trend MU providers Non-MU providers p value
No. providers 112 55 70 90 87 41† 46
Data access
 % Of encounters per provider with
  Problem list marked as reviewed 9.4 (3.8–15.5) 5.1 (0.9–19.9) 7.5 (1.6–13.7) 7.4 (1.9–11.3) 7.5 (4.2–14.6) 0.72 6.0 (3.7–10.0) 10.7 (6.8–20.7) 0.002
  Medication list marked as reviewed 5.8 (2.4–15.5) 2.3 (0.1–10.9) 4.0 (0.7–11.1) 4.9 (1.6–10.4) 8.9 (4.5–15.3) 0.05 8.2 (3.6–11.0) 10.4 (5.2–17.1) 0.09
  Allergies marked as reviewed 81.0 (73.3–85.1) 78.9 (71.6–82.8) 82.3 (75.2–86.9) 81.9 (73.0–87.6) 81.1 (73.7–86.0) 0.28 81.3 (73.3–86.6) 80.5 (73.7–85.9) 0.93
  Problem list altered 23.6 (17.1–30.0) 19.5 (14.7–24.1) 23.0 (17.1–27.7) 22.2 (16.6–29.7) 25.0 (17.3–33.2) 0.002 22.8 (16.9–33.3) 27.7 (20.6–32.3) 0.39
   ≥1 problem added 23.6 (17.1–30.0) 19.5 (14.7–24.1) 23.0 (17.1–27.7) 22.2 (16.6–29.7) 25.0 (17.3–32.8) 0.002 22.7 (16.9–32.8) 27.6 (20.6–32.3) 0.39
   ≥1 problem replaced 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.07 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.75
   ≥1 problem dropped 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.39 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.36
 Days to review laboratory results 4.4 (2.9–7.4) 4.9 (3.0–8.5) 5.3 (3.0–9.8) 4.1 (2.8–7.5) 4.0 (2.5–5.9) 0.01 4.0 (2.4–5.8) 4.0 (2.5–5.9) 0.59
Clinical decision support measures
 % Best-practice alerts ‘accepted’ 17.7 (9.4–24.6) 18.6 (13.0–27.0) 19.6 (12.6–30.0) 20.9 (10.7–30.0) 18.6 (10.4–26.0) 0.91 22.5 (13.8–28.4) 16.7 (8.6–24.4) 0.03
 % Prescribing alerts ‘accepted’ 0.1 (0.0–0.2) 0.0 (0.0–0.3) 0.0 (0.0–0.3) 0.0 (0.0–0.2) 0.0 (0.0–0.1) 0.11 0.0 (0.0–0.1) 0.0 (0.0–0.1) 0.91
  Drug–allergy alerts 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) NT 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) NT
  Drug–disease alerts 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) NT 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) NT
  Drug–drug interaction alerts 0.1 (0.0–0.3) 0.0 (0.0–0.4) 0.0 (0.0–0.4) 0.0 (0.0–0.2) 0.0 (0.0–0.2) NT 0.0 (0.0–0.1) 0.0 (0.0–0.2) NT
  Drug–food alerts 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) NT 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) NT
Ordering
 Laboratory tests ordered per encounter 1.0 (0.7–1.4) 0.7 (0.4–0.9) 0.8 (0.5–1.1) 1.2 (0.8–1.5) 1.2 (0.9–1.6) <0.001 1.2 (0.7–1.6) 1.3 (0.9–1.6) 0.44
 Number of order set uses per encounter 1.1 (0.8–1.4) 1.1 (0.9–1.4) 1.1 (0.9–1.6) 1.1 (0.8–1.5) 1.1 (0.8–1.3) 0.61 1.1 (0.8–1.3) 1.0 (0.8–1.3) 0.36
Care coordination measures
 % Encounters with after-visit summary printed 59.2 (26.9–83.6) 10.8 (3.2–33.5) 47.8 (21.3–74.2) 73.1 (28.6–90.9) 89.5 (67.1–96.0) <0.001 94.9 (89.5–97.6) 72.7 (37.0–90.8) <0.001
 Patients messaged/month 1 (0–3) 1 (0–3) 1 (1–4) 1 (0–4) 1 (0–4) 0.53 1 (0–5) 1 (0–3) 0.16
 Provider-initiated messages/month 1 (0–4) 2 (0–4) 1 (1–5) 1 (0–4) 1 (0–4) 0.46 1 (0–6) 1 (0–3) 0.20
 % Patient-initiated messages responded to 100 (98–100) 100 (100–100) 100 (99–100) 100 (98–100) 100 (99–100) 0.12 100 (94–100) 100 (100–100) 0.35
 % Of patient panel using portal during year 6.9 (3.6–13.2) 11.3 (6.4–26.1) 10.8 (5.2–19.9) 8.2 (4.0–14.3) 6.0 (2.8–11.5) <0.001‡ 6.8 (3.8–14.5) 4.9 (2.5–11.3) 0.14
 % Of portal users using portal ≥15 times/year 57.6 (51.6–64.7) 55.3 (50.9–65.6) 59.8 (53.2–67.1) 64.4 (54.3–72.1) 54.7 (43.8–66.0) 0.001‡  50.0 (41.8–58.8) 57.2 (48.2–66.7) 0.08
Population/panel level
 Viewed panel-level reports (median number of views) 0.0 (0.0–3.8) NA 0.0 (0.0–5.0) 0.0 (0.0–5.0) 0.0 (0.0–1.0) 0.43 0.0 (0.0–3.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.01
MU objective measures§
 Core
  Core 1—CPOE 100 (99–100) NA 100 (99–100) 100 (99–100) 100 (99–100) DNC 100 (100–100) 100 (99–100) 0.42
  Core 3—Problem list 97 (95–98) NA 96 (95–97) 97 (95–98) 98 (96–99) 0.02 98 (97–99) 98 (95–99) 0.51
  Core 4—E-prescribing 68 (40–84) NA 71 (44–84) 75 (46–87) 76 (50–87) 0.26 77 (64–88) 68 (37–86) 0.03
  Core 5—Medication list 96 (93–97) NA 95 (93–97) 95 (94–97) 97 (95–98) 0.01 97 (95–98) 97 (95–98) 0.67
  Core 6—Allergy list 99 (99–100) NA 99 (99–100) 99 (99–100) 99 (99–100) 0.17 99 (99–100) 99 (99–100) 0.44
  Core 7—Demographics recorded 94 (91–97) NA 94 (91–96) 94 (91–96) 95 (91–97) 0.43 96 (93–97) 95 (91–97) 0.94
  Core 8—Vitals recorded 97 (96–98) NA 97 (96–98) 98 (97–98) 98 (97–98) <0.001 98 (97–98) 98 (97–98) 0.79
  Core 9—Smoking status recorded 98 (97–99) NA 98 (96–99) 99 (98–99) 99 (98–99) 0.75 99 (98–99) 98 (97–99) 0.36
  Core 11—Patient copy of health information 100 (100–100) NA –¶ –¶ 100 (100–100) NT 100 (100–100) 100 (100–100) >0.99
  Core 12—After-visit summary 63 (33–78) NA 42 (28–64) 64 (31–81) 72 (49–84) <0.001 77 (66–85) 65 (38–81) 0.01
Menu
 Menu 7—Timely access to data for patients 83 (76–90) NA 73 (70–79) 81 (77–87) 91 (84–98) <0.001 85 (83–91) 95 (88–100) <0.001
 Menu 8—Patient education 65 (57–75) NA 56 (47–66) 69 (60–79) 73 (64–81) <0.001 77 (69–85) 70 (60–75) 0.001
 Menu 9—Medication reconciliation 15 (8–29) NA 10 (3–19) 13 (5–27) 21 (11–38) <0.001 18 (9–35) 25 (13–48) 0.18
 Menu 10—Summary of care at transitions 77 (36–91) NA 51 (25–78) 80 (39–94) 85 (58–97) <0.001 92 (80–97) 70 (34–95) 0.01

For definitions of ‘accepted’ for best-practice alerts and prescribing alerts, please see the Methods section.

*Pooled results across all years are reported, except for panel-level reports and MU measures, for which weighted averages are reported.

†Although 42 providers attested at the end of 2012, one did not contribute data to the 2013 data set and is excluded from this comparison.

‡Comparisons do not include 2013 data as half-year results would not be expected to be similar to full-year results.

§Percentage of patients for whom metric was met, except for e-prescribing metric, which is calculated as a percentage of prescriptions. Core 2, 10, and 13 were accomplished at the organizational level and are not included as they do not vary by provider.

¶No provider had data for this measure in 2011 or 2012.

CPOE, computerized provider order entry; DNC, (model) did not converge; EHR, electronic health record; MU, meaningful use; NA, not available; NT, not tested.