Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 4;6:156–165. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.08.026

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

A: Performance differences on the four FAT tasks between schizophrenia groups (SZ) and the HC24 healthy comparison group expressed as effect sizes (Hedges' g). Left: hatched bars illustrate effect sizes (group differences) for SZ's first FAT session and HC24's only FAT session. Right: hatched bars illustrate effect sizes (group differences) at the end of the intervention period for SZ's last FAT session and HC24's only FAT session. B: Left: performance scores (ordinate, with higher score indicating better performance) per task (abscissa: same/different, blended emotion task, emotion sequence, emotion location task; see text for description of each task) plotted separately for pre-training (dark gray bars) and post-training (hatched bars) in the FAT group. Scores represent mean ± 1.0 SE. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. Right: performance difference post-training relative to pre-training expressed as effect sizes (Hedges' g) per task, bars indicating better performance after the 20-session training period.