Fig. 5.

Relationship between change in performance scores on the blended emotion task (last training session minus first training session) and change in alpha power increase in the FAR criterion task (post- minus pre-FAT-training) in the FAT group. Left: topographic representation of significant (p = .04) relationship between change in performance scores and change in alpha power increase in a fronto-central ROI. The relationship is represented by color-coded correlation coefficients (for r > .5, p < .05), with warm colors indicating higher correlation. Black circles indicate MEG-sensors belonging to the fronto-central ROI of significant correlation. This ROI was used to compute alpha power scores plotted in the right panel. Right: relationship between change in performance and change in alpha power modulation in the FAT group, each circle representing an individual subject.