Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 28;6:115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.08.023

Table 2.

AD/HC performance of the final models: ADNI cohort.

Models OOB error [Train] Sensitivity/specificity (OA) [Test] AUC (95% C.I.)
Cortical thickness RFE 14.0% 88.6%/90.7% (89.62%) 0.93 (0.9–0.96)
Sulcal depth 21.3% 80.0%/74.7% (77.3%) 0.84 (0.8–0.89)
Jacobian 21.7% 77.1%/81.3% (79.2%) 0.84 (0.79–0.88)
Volumes 15.0% 82.9%/86.7% (84.7%) 0.91 (0.88–0.95)
Thickness + volumes (ROI) 11.7% 88.6%/92.0% (90.3%) 0.94 (0.91–0.96)
Thickness no RFE 14.7% 88.6%/89.3% (89.0%) 0.92 (0.89–0.95)
Sulcal depth 14.0% 80.0%/73.3% (76.67%) 0.83 (0.79–0.88)
Jacobian 21.0% 80.0%/80.0% (80.0%) 0.84 (0.79–0.88)
Volumes 16.7% 80.0%/86.7% (83.3%) 0.91 (0.88–0.94)
Thickness + volumes (ROI) 12% 85.7%/89.3% (87.5%) 0.93 (0.91–0.96)

AD/HC — Alzheimer's disease/healthy controls; OA — overall accuracy; OOB — out-of-bag estimate; AUC (95% C.I.) — area under the ROC curve with 95% confidence interval.