Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 6.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Use Misuse. 2014 Jul 17;49(14):1908–1919. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2014.935792

TABLE 4.

Unconditional latent class growth analysis

Family Functioning
Parent Support
Low Increasing Low Decreasing High Increasing High Decreasing Low Stable Low Increasing High Decreasing High Increasing
Means
Intercept 2.32*** 2.71*** 3.36*** 3.22*** 2.31*** 2.55*** 3.83*** 4.45***
Slope .38*** −.26*** .13*** −.12** −.07 .56*** −.23*** .04*
Number of subjects (%) 71 (8.3%) 56 (6.6%) 570 (67.1%) 152 (17.9%) 65 (7.7%) 101 (12.0%) 179 (21.1%) 503 (59.3%)
Entropy .84 .82
Goodness of Fit
Bayesian (BIC) 4417.18 7538.45
LMR LRT p = .03 p = .02

Note:

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001