Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 4;186(16):1211–1219. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.140547

Table 2:

Results of the updated literature search, reference screening and reference classification

Characteristic Guidelines topic and year of publication Total
Major depression in adults, 200815 Obesity in childhood and adolescence, 200918 Prostate cancer treatment, 200816 Secondary prevention of stroke, 200917
References found during updated exhaustive literature search, no. 11 243 9 763 3 343 14 787 39 136
First reference screening from all recommendations, no. (%)
Duplicate 3 846 (34.2) 2 445 (25.0) 286 (8.6) 1 582 (10.7) 8 159 (20.8)
Excluded 6 976 (62.0) 6 981 (71.5) 2 901 (86.8) 12 940 (87.5) 29 798 (76.1)
Included (pertinent references) 260 (2.3) 334 (3.4) 102 (3.1) 255 (1.7) 951 (2.4)
New* 161 (1.4) 3 (0.0) 54 (1.6) 10 (0.1) 228 (0.6)
Second reference screening from sample recommendations, no. (%) n = 192 n = 292 n = 106 n = 78 n = 668
Pertinent references 73 (38.0) 93 (31.8) 22 (20.8) 12 (15.4) 200 (29.9)
Relevant references 106 (55.2) 167 (57.2) 73 (68.9) 53 (67.9) 399 (59.7)
Key references 13 (6.8) 32 (11.0) 11 (10.4) 13 (16.7) 69 (10.3)
Key references, type of study, no. (%) n = 13 n = 32 n = 11 n = 13 n = 69
Randomized controlled trial 8 (61.5) 23 (71.9) 9 (81.8) 4 (30.8) 44 (63.8)
Systematic review 5 (38.5) 9 (28.1) 2 (18.2) 9 (69.2) 25 (36.2)
Key references, recommendation change, no. (%)§
Population 1 (7.7) 4 (12.5) 1 (7.7) 6 (8.7)
Intervention 12 (92.3) 5 (15.6) 2 (18.2) 7 (53.8) 26 (37.7)
Comparison 2 (6.3) 2 (18.2) 1 (7.7) 5 (7.2)
Outcome 9 (69.2) 2 (6.3) 3 (27.3) 14 (20.3)
Quality of the evidence 11 (84.6) 25 (78.1) 5 (45.5) 5 (38.5) 46 (66.7)
Direction of the recommendation 9 (69.2) 9 (13.0)
Strength of the recommendation 11 (84.6) 14 (43.8) 7 (63.6) 6 (46.2) 38 (55.1)
*

References that may be related to new recommendations.

All relevant references were also pertinent.

All key references were also pertinent and relevant.

§

One reference may change more than one issue.

Fourteen key references changed the quality of evidence.