Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Oct 9;44(11):890–898. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5268

Table 5.

Group comparisons between the uninvolved hip of participants with unilateral CHJP and the matched hip of asymptomatic controls. Muscle torque is normalized by body weight X height X 100.

CHJP
N=22
Control
N=22
Mean difference % difference P Value
ERs90°* 4.01 ± 0.79 4.48 ± 1.12 −0.47 (−1.06, 0.12) 10% 0.12
IRs90°* 4.28 ± 1.34 5.09 ± 1.60 −0.81 (−1.71, 0.84) 16% 0.07
ERs0°* 3.12 ± 0.88 3.79 ± 1.14 −0.67 (−1.29, −0.06) 18% 0.03
IRs0°* 2.71 ± 0.78 3.11 ± 0.96 −0.40 (−0.93, 0.13) 13% 0.14
ABDs* 7.71 ± 1.69 9.16 ± 2.61 −1.45 (−2.78, −0.11) 16% 0.04

Abbreviations: CHJP, chronic hip joint pain

ERs90° = external rotators with hip flexed 90°

IRs90° = internal rotators with hip flexed 90°

ERs0° = external rotators with hip in neutral flexion/extension 0°

IRs0° = internal rotators hip in neutral flexion/extension 0°

ABDs = abductors with the hip abducted 15°

*

Values are means ± SD.

Values in parentheses are 95% confidence interval.