Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 7.
Published in final edited form as: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2014 Apr 7;38(1-2):89–146. doi: 10.1159/000357839

Table 6.

Differences between the BEHAVE-AD [1] and the BEHAVE-AD-FW [2] and the NPI [29, 30, 133] in the context of the assessment of treatment of BPSD-related disturbances in AD*

Methodology BEHAVE-AD [1] and BEHAVE-AD-FW [2] NPI [29, 30, 133]
Information
ascertainment
methodology
Twenty-five, generally commonly occurring behavioral
symptoms in AD, falling within 7 symptomatic categories are
assessed. Each symptom is individually assessed on a
4-point severity scale for the BEHAVE-AD or on a 4-point
severity scale and a 4-point frequency scale (with the
exception of a 3-point frequency scale for 1 of the 25
symptomatic items) for the BEHAVE-AD-FW.
Surveys symptoms in 12 symptomatic
categories. These include categories
which are relevant for behavioral
disturbances in AD and other categories
which are not relevant for AD but
applicable for mania or hypomania,
affective disorder, or other conditions.
Symptoms in the 12 categories are
surveyed. Each category is scored on a
4-point frequency scale and a 3-point
severity scale. Individual symptoms
are not scored.
Nature of
information
obtained: relevance
to AD
All 7 symptomatic categories contain symptoms which are
commonly occurring at one or more dementia stages of AD.
These range from a prevalence of >20% for Hallucinatory
Disturbances in mild dementia and moderately severe
dementia (GDS stages 4 and 6 [7]) to >60% prevalence at one
or more dementia stages for the Paranoid and Delusional
Ideation, Activity Disturbances, Aggressiveness, Affective
Disturbances, and Anxieties and Phobias symptomatic
categories [22]. Therefore, 5 of the 7 BEHAVE-AD symptomatic
categories have a prevalence of >60% at one or more of the 4
GDS dementia stages.
Surveys 12 symptomatic categories, some
of which have no relevance for AD or have
more relevance for medication side effects
than for the symptomatology of AD. For
example, the NPI symptomatic category
‘Elation/Euphoria’, a symptom of mania
and related conditions, was found to
occur in only 1 of 214 AD persons at all
levels of severity in a community survey
[31]. This was similar to the prevalence in
nondemented persons in the community.
Therefore, Elation/Euphoria is not a
symptom of AD. Another example is the
NPI symptomatic category ‘Appetite/
Eating Disorders’, which includes
symptoms such as increase in appetite,
gaining weight, and poor appetite. These
symptoms are not part of the behavioral
disturbances of AD and are generally not
part of AD in any context. Some of these
symptoms occur in depressive disorder
and they can occur as a result of side
effects of putative AD therapies or be
confused with the musculoskeletal
wasting in the final GDS stage 7 of AD.
Mixing symptoms which are not part of
the behavioral pathologic syndrome of AD
but which can occur as a result of
medication side effects with symptoms
which are behavioral disturbances can
cloud the assessment of risk/benefit
ratios of putative therapies for AD
behavioral disturbances.
Separation of
cognitive and
functional changes
in AD from the
behavioral
disturbances of AD
versus mixing of
cognitive and
functional
symptoms of AD
with behavioral
disturbances of AD
The purpose of a rating scale for the assessment of behavioral
disturbances in AD is to assess those symptoms for treatment
which may be applicable for these disturbances. These
treatments include both pharmacological and
nonpharmacological treatments. The BEHAVE-AD and the
BEHAVE-AD-FW contain 7 symptomatic categories. All these
symptomatic categories have demonstrated significant (p <
0.01) positive responses to the nonpharmacological effects of
entry into the placebo arm of a clinical trial, and these effects
appear to have been independent of effects on cognition [e.g.,
25]. Furthermore, total BEHAVE-AD scores showed a
significant additional response above that of the placebo
condition to antipsychotic medication pharmacotherapy in this
trial (p = 0.001). Positive responses were seen for 6 of the 7
BEHAVE-AD symptomatic categories. These effects were
independent of cognition [25]. The one category of the
BEHAVE-AD which did not show an additional positive
response above that of the placebo condition to the
pharmacotherapy in the antipsychotic medication trial of Katz
et al. [25], i.e., Anxieties and Phobias, has shown a significant
positive response to pharmacotherapy, above that of placebo,
in an antianxiety medication trial [24]. In this study, once
again, total BEHAVE-AD scores, BEHAVE-AD global scores, and
each of the BEHAVE-AD symptomatic categories showed
improvements on the nonspecific placebo intervention. An
anxiolytic medication produced additional improvements
above the placebo condition on 6 of the 7 BEHAVE-AD
symptomatic categories. The one symptomatic category which
showed no change in the Katz et al. [25] antipsychotic
medication trial showed a significant added benefit, over and
above that of the placebo condition, with the anxiolytic
medication (buspirone) [24]. These effects in the Levy et al.
[24] trial appear to have been independent of effects on
cognition (i.e., no significant changes on the MMSE were seen).
Therefore, all BEHAVE-AD symptomatic categories have been
demonstrated to be potentially responsive to
pharmacotherapies independent of the effects on cognition.
These observations are compatible with the design of the
BEHAVE-AD, which contains cognition-independent symptoms
and symptomatic categories which, although related to AD, do
not correlate with cognition or functional changes in AD.
Another way of explaining the above statement is that all
BEHAVE-AD and BEHAVE-AD-FW symptoms and symptomatic
categories peak at some stage prior to the final GDS stage 7 of
AD [7, 22]. Another qualitative difference of the BEHAVE-AD
and BEHAVE-AD-FW symptomatic categories and the
individual BEHAVE-AD and BEHAVE-AD-FW symptoms is that
all these symptoms, and symptomatic categories, although
generally commonly occurring at various stages, do not occur
universally at any stage of AD. This prevalence is
fundamentally different from cognitive and functional changes
in AD, which become increasingly universal as the disease
progresses.
The NPI contains a symptomatic category
termed ‘Apathy/Indifference’, which, as
defined, tracks very closely with the
progressive cognitive and functional
changes in AD. For example, as defined in
the NPI, this category includes symptoms
such as ‘is he/she more difficult to engage
in… doing chores?’ Also, ‘does the patient
contribute less to household chores?’ and
‘is it more difficult to keep a conversation
going?’ These changes track very closely
with the cognitive and functional
progression of AD. For example, it has
been demonstrated that each GDS stage of
AD from MCI to mild dementia, to
moderate dementia, is associated with
progressive changes (losses) in self-care,
household activities, general activities,
food preparation, etc. [136]. Additionally,
these progressive AD cognition and
functional stage-related changes have
been demonstrated for conversation and
social functioning [136]. The problem
with including a subscale which is
primarily cognitively and functionally
based in a behavioral inventory is that
when applied to medications with
positive effects on cognition and
functioning, these positive effects can be
misinterpreted as positive effects on
behavioral disturbances.
*

Copyright © 2013 Barry Reisberg, MD. All rights reserved.