Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Jun 20;35(8):978–983. doi: 10.1086/677157

TABLE 3.

Variability in Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) Detection as a Function of Microbiology Laboratory Practices

Hospitals No. of
hospitals
Mean (±SD) CRE
detected per 100,000
patient-days per hospital
Pa
Reporting CRE to infection control 22 1.64 ± 2.30 .16
Not reporting CRE to infection control 2 0
Using Vitek 2 system 12 2.47 ± 2.78 .01
Using Microscan system 12 0.54 ± 0.85
Performing a modified Hodge test 9 2.36 ± 3.34 .07
Sending strains to outside laboratory 13 1.00 ± 1.06
Adopting 2010 CLSI breakpoints 5 3.62 ± 3.52 <.01
Not adopting 2010 CLSI breakpoints 19 1.08 ± 1.61

NOTE. CRE is endemic in one of the study hospitals, which was therefore excluded from this analysis. CLSI, Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute; SD, standard deviation.

a

Calculated using Student t test.