Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 3.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care. 2011 May;49(5):427–435. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318207ed9e

Table 4.

Fully-Adjusted Association between High Adherence to Hormone Therapy and Hip Fracture after External Adjustment for Low Adherence Behaviors

Formula RRplacebo RRfull
RRfull=RRadj×Pl(RRplacebo1)+1Ph(RRplacebo1)+1
1 / 0.50 = 2.0 0.62*
1 / 0.33 = 3.03 0.68
1 / 0.78 = 1.28 0.57
*

example calculation per (28), RRfull=0.54×0.50(2.01)+10.30(2.01)+1=0.62

RRadj=0.54 (observed adjusted association between high adherence to HT and hip fracture)

Ph=0.30 (prevalence of poor adherence behavior among women with high adherence to placebo, i.e., prevalence of low/missing persistence with osteoporosis medications from table 3)

Pl=0.50 (prevalence of poor adherence behavior among women with low adherence to placebo, i.e., prevalence of low/missing persistence with osteoporosis medications from table 3)

RRplacebo=0.50 (95%CI=0.33–0.78), inverted observed adjusted association between poor adherence to placebo and hip fracture, observed in Table 2

RRfull=fully adjusted association between HT and hip fracture, after controlling for residual confounding (adherence behavior identified by adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy).

Applying differential adherence to statins identifies similar externally-adjusted results, i.e., RR=0.63, with point estimates for the RR ranging from 0.57 to 0.69 depending on the true value of RRplacebo