Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 6;59(2):425–435. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12312

Table 2.

Comparing lone actors by network connectivity.

Individuals Without Command and Control Links (n = 87) (%) Individuals With Command and Control Links (n = 21) (%) Isolated Dyads (n = 11) (%)
Based in the United States 55.2*** 4.8*** 36.4
Previous military experience 31*** 4.8** 9.1
Previous criminal conviction 47.1** 19** 36.4
Held a PhD 2.3 0 18.2**
Lived alone 40.2 38.1 9.1**
Lived away from home when ideology adopted 23 42.9* 27.3
Received training 20.7 33.3 0*
Learnt through virtual sources 40.2*** 66.7* 72.7*
History of mental illness 35.6** 19 9.1
Socially isolated 57.5* 33.3* 45.5
Recently joined a wider group/movement 27.6** 47.6 45.5
Noticeable increase in religiosity 23*** 61.9*** 27.3
Family/close associates involved in political violence/crime 27.6*** 57.1** 63.6**
Interacted face-to-face with wider network 39.1*** 61.9 90.3***
Interacted virtually with wider network 28.7*** 57.1** 63.6*
Others helped procure weaponry 17.2*** 38.1* 45.5*
Others helped build IED 6.9*** 33.3*** 27.3
Others aware of individual’s planning 42.5*** 100*** 100***
Attempted to recruit others 27.6** 33.3 81.8***
Consumed propaganda from a wider movement 65.5* 85.7* 72.7
Al-Qaeda related 33.3*** 76.2*** 63.6
Single issue 23** 4.8* 0
Right wing 39.1** 9.5** 36.4
Successfully executed an attack 57.5** 33.3* 27.3
 

*p < 0.1; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01.