Table 3.
Comparing successful lone actors to intercepted lone actors.
| Did the Individual Successfully Commit an Attack? | Yes (n = 61) (%) | No (n = 58) (%) |
|---|---|---|
| University experience | 54.1*** | 24.1 |
| Socially isolated | 70.5*** | 34.5 |
| History of mental illness | 39.3* | 24.1 |
| Previously rejected from wider group | 16.4** | 3.4 |
| Other’s aware of research/planning or preparation for event | 36.1 | 79.3*** |
| Attempted to recruit others | 24.6 | 44.8** |
| Learnt through virtual sources | 29.5 | 63.8*** |
| Bomb-making Manuals in home | 31.1 | 70.7*** |
| Recently exposed to new media | 19.7 | 41.4*** |
| Interacted virtually with wider network | 24.6 | 46.6** |
| Read or consumed literature/propaganda from a wider movement | 52.5 | 84.5*** |
| Read or consumed literature/propaganda about other lone actors | 11.5 | 43.1*** |
| Read or consumed literature/propaganda of other lone Actors | 8.2 | 22.4** |
*p < 0.1; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01.