Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Traumatology (Tallahass Fla). 2014 Sep;20(3):219–224. doi: 10.1037/h0099402

Table 1.

Hierarchical Regression Model Predicting Posttraumatic Growth

Predictor B b SE p
Step 1
Age .01 .15 .00 .000
Race −.69 −.31 .06 .000
Education −.14 −.12 .04 .000
Step 2
Age .01 .13 .00 .000
Race −.57 −.28 .07 .000
Education −.09 −.11 .04 .000
CSA .02 .05 .02 .117
Alcohol SA −.19 −.10 .07 .003
Life threat .27 .12 .07 .000
Step 3
Age .01 .08 .00 .001
Race −.45 −.21 .06 .000
Education −.13 −.11 .03 .000
CSA .02 .03 .02 .313
Alcohol SA −.09 −.04 .06 .153
Life threat .23 .11 .06 .000
Maladaptive coping −.02 −.11 .01 .001
Adaptive social coping −.03 −.06 .01 .133
Adaptive individual coping .04 .32 .01 .000
Perceived control .21 .15 .04 .000
Character self-blame −.07 −.06 .03 .039
Core beliefs .15 .17 .02 .000
Acknowledge w/o support .05 .04 .05 .347
Turning against reactions −.09 −.07 .04 .036
Good reactions .15 .13 .04 .000
PTSD −.01 −.08 .00 .022

Note: Coefficients for each step of the model shown. Step 1: F (3, 1077) = 66.04, p = .000, Adjusted R2 = .15; Step 2: F (6, 1074) = 38.84, p = .000, Adjusted R2 = .17; Step 3: F (16, 1064) = 41.64, p = .000, Adjusted R2 = .40.