Table 4.
Percentage of young bilinguals in Experiment 1 whose self-rated language dominance matched or differed from objective measures of dominance. For cases in which self-ratings and objective classifications of dominance do not match the range of discrepancy in scores is indicated in parentheses.
| Self-rated as Mandarin dominant(n=14) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Objectively Mandarin-dominant | Objectively balanced | Objective English-dominant | |
| Oral proficiency interview | 93% | 0% | 7% |
| (35.0%) | |||
| Multilingual naming test | 64% | 29% | 7% |
| (0% - 4.4%) | (7.4%) | ||
| Boston naming test | 86% | 7% | 7% |
| (-3.3%) | (5.0%) | ||
| Self-rated as Balanced(n=6) | |||
| Oral proficiency interview | 17% | 33% | 50% |
| (-15.0%) | (15.0% - 20.0%) | ||
| Multilingual naming test | 17% | 17% | 67% |
| (-20.6%) | (10.3% - 17.6%) | ||
| Boston naming test | 17% | 0% | 83% |
| (-26.7%) | (16.7% - 41.7%) | ||
| Self-rated as English-dominant(n=42) | |||
| Oral proficiency interview | 12% | 10% | 79% |
| ((-10.0%) - (-5%)) | 0% | ||
| Multilingual naming test | 0% | 12% | 88% |
| (-4.4%)-(4.4%) | |||
| Boston naming test | 0% | 5% | 95% |
| ((-3.3%) - (1.7%)) | |||