. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Biling (Camb Engl). 2014 Apr;17(2):364–383. doi: 10.1017/S1366728913000424

Table 7.

Percentage of bilingual children in Experiment 2 whose parent-rated language dominance matched or differed from objective measures of dominance. For cases in which parent-ratings and objective classifications of dominance do not match the range of discrepancy in scores is indicated in parentheses.

	Rated by Parents as Mandarin dominant(n=5)

	Objectively Mandarin-dominant	Objectively balanced	Objective English-dominant
Oral proficiency interview	40%	40%	20%
		(0%)	(10%)
Multilingual naming test	0%	40%	60%
		((-1.5%) - 4.4%)	(26%-38%)

	Rated by Parents as Balanced(n=3)
Oral proficiency interview	0%	67%	33%
			(10%)
Multilingual naming test	0%	0%	100%
			(7%-60%)
	Rated by Parents as English-dominant(n=19)
Oral proficiency interview	21%	5%	74%
	(-10.0%)	0%
Multilingual naming test	0%	0%	100%